From britdisc-owner@csv.warwick.ac.uk Tue Dec 2 12:19:21 1997 Received: (from daemon@localhost) by pansy.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.8.7/8.8.8) id LAA00812 for britdisc-outgoing; Tue, 2 Dec 1997 11:49:17 GMT Received: from mailgate.city.ac.uk (mailgate.city.ac.uk [138.40.12.3]) by pansy.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.8.7/8.8.8) with SMTP id LAA00799 for <britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk>; Tue, 2 Dec 1997 11:49:13 GMT Received: from netmail.city.ac.uk [138.40.12.1] by mailgate.city.ac.uk with smtp (City SMTP listener 1.71 #1) id 0xcql5-00065y-00; Tue, 2 Dec 1997 11:44:55 +0000 Received: from donovan.city.ac.uk [138.40.85.16] by netmail.city.ac.uk with smtp (City Mailer 1.73 #1) id 0xcqox-0002fI-00; Tue, 2 Dec 1997 11:48:55 +0000 Comments: Authenticated sender is <bt502@pophost> From: "AILES G M" <G.M.Ailes@icsl.ac.uk> To: Britdisc <britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk> Date: Tue, 2 Dec 1997 11:53:53 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Subject: Student eligibility X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (v2.23) Message-Id: <E0xcqox-0002fI-00@netmail.city.ac.uk> Sender: owner-britdisc@warwick.ac.uk Precedence: bulk Dear All, I have been reading the e-mails on student eligibility with much interest and would like to throw my twopence in for good measure. So far lots of good points have been raised on all sides: yes, it is a bit dodgy to allow 1 or more eternal students to dominate a side and even a tournament at student level. In addition we would not want postgrads to be put off from starting up new teams on the basis that they would be barred from playing at student national level. (Remembering that there are lots of 'mixed' tournaments where eligibility isn't in question). There have also been good points raised on the difficulties some people have if they are postgrads but have only just started playing. We don't want to discourage these people either. What all this leads me to believe is that there can be no hard and fast rules on the subject. I'm pretty sure there is someone in charge of student nationals who sits on the BUF. Couldn't that person get together with a couple of others and form a kind of eligibility committee deciding each case on its merits. The invites to student nationals would clearly set out that every team would be under a duty to inform the committee and request an eligibility ruling on any candidate it wasn't sure of, setting out any arguments it would like to be considered. The judgement of this committee would be based on certain agreed guidelines loosely aiming towards the promotion of good quality student Ultimate. I know this may seem like a hassle but it would only have to be done once a year. You would have a deadline by which time all eligibility applications would have to be made and then all the applications could be considered together. It sounds like there would be quite a few applications made but I don't think an unmanageable number of these would be contentious. Thanks for having a read of this to all those who got this far but I would like to add as an aside that when I played for the Bears in my first year on the B Team we came last in every single tournament we entered. That team included Steve Shipley, Rachel and Shirley all of GB fame. In our last year we won several tournaments including Newport with not a postgrad among us. Gavin Ailes (Angels/SLUT)