From britdisc-owner@csv.warwick.ac.uk  Tue Oct 13 15:46:24 1998
Received: (from daemon@localhost)
	by pansy.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.8.7/8.8.8) id PAA25554
	for britdisc-outgoing; Tue, 13 Oct 1998 15:35:50 +0100 (BST)
Received: from tgis.co.uk (galahad.tgis.co.uk [195.188.4.6])
	by pansy.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.8.7/8.8.8) with ESMTP id PAA25526
	for <britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk>; Tue, 13 Oct 1998 15:35:46 +0100 (BST)
Received: from syscap.com (p045.5399-3.saturn.ispc.net [212.46.128.185]) by tgis.co.uk (8.8.7/8.6.9) with SMTP id PAA14628; Tue, 13 Oct 1998 15:35:35 +0100
Posted-Date: Tue, 13 Oct 1998 15:35:35 +0100
Received: from [195.188.6.81] by syscap.com
     Tue, 13 Oct 98 15:21:31 +0100
X-Sender: pharvey@195.188.6.1
Message-Id: <v0213051fb24911c535cf@[195.188.6.81]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 1998 15:32:42 +0100
To: "Rob Mitchell"<admrwm@ccg.acu.man.ac.uk>, britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk
From: pharvey@syscap.com (Peter Harvey)
Subject: RE: Discussion on World Ultimate
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by pansy.csv.warwick.ac.uk id PAA25539
Sender: owner-britdisc@warwick.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk

>I was alluding more to the phenomenon of the best
>players gravitating towards the best team in order to get high class
>international competition.
Unfortunateley a lack of new [young] players was a part of our demise. Was it because we were labelled aloof and unapproachable that we were ineffecive in pulling in fresh talent? or did we just not suck hard enough? (go on Wigsy, I left that one just for you!)

>we now have a situation at the top of
>British Ultimate, with two or three teams able to compete for honours, something
>we have not had for many years. It would be a shame to tip the balance in one
>direction or the other.
Absolutely, with 2 or 3 teams in the running there should be good opportunity to have 'clusters' of tight players to assist integration and 'gelling' of a super-team.

Harv