From britdisc-owner@csv.warwick.ac.uk  Thu Mar 11 18:07:34 1999
Received: by pansy.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.9.1/8.9.1) id SAA05115
	for britdisc-outgoing; Thu, 11 Mar 1999 18:07:10 GMT
Received: from snowdrop.csv.warwick.ac.uk (snowdrop [137.205.192.31])
	by pansy.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id SAA05107
	for <britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk>; Thu, 11 Mar 1999 18:07:09 GMT
Received: from curlew.cs.man.ac.uk (curlew.cs.man.ac.uk [130.88.13.7])
	by snowdrop.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.9.1b+Sun/8.9.1) with ESMTP id SAA07522
	for <britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk>; Thu, 11 Mar 1999 18:07:08 GMT
Received: from fs1.eng.man.ac.uk ([130.88.29.100])
	by curlew.cs.man.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 1.92 #2)
	for britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk
	id 10L6NU-00004x-00; Thu, 11 Mar 1999 14:24:00 +0000
Received: from UK-AC-MAN-ENG-FS1/SpoolDir by fs1.eng.man.ac.uk (Mercury 1.44);
    11 Mar 99 14:23:59 BST
Received: from SpoolDir by UK-AC-MAN-ENG-FS1 (Mercury 1.43); 11 Mar 99 12:48:41 BST
From: "P.P.Guest" <MBGA5PPG@fs1.eng.man.ac.uk>
Organization:  University of Manchester
To: britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk
Date:          Thu, 11 Mar 1999 12:48:32 BST
Subject:       RE: drop the pull
X-mailer: Pegasus Mail v3.31
Message-ID: <1627F7E0D0D@fs1.eng.man.ac.uk>
Sender: owner-britdisc@warwick.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk

> Couldn't agree more. 
> If you risk catching the pull to gain an advantage and screw up, you should
> be penalised with a turnover.
> Fraser
> (sneeeky's)
> 
Doesn't this rule change give recieving players the chance to just hit 
the disc back as far as they can the other way? Doesn't sound like a 
particularly workable rule to me - too open to abuse.

Cheers,
 Paul (f6)

-------------------------------
Paul Guest
University of Manchester
P.P.Guest@stud.man.ac.uk
MBGA5PPG@fs1.eng.man.ac.uk