From britdisc-owner@csv.warwick.ac.uk  Tue Jun 29 11:26:09 1999
Received: by pansy.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) id LAA10150
	for britdisc-outgoing; Tue, 29 Jun 1999 11:24:56 +0100 (BST)
Received: from snowdrop.csv.warwick.ac.uk (snowdrop [137.205.192.31])
	by pansy.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA10140
	for <britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk>; Tue, 29 Jun 1999 11:24:54 +0100 (BST)
Received: from probity.mcc.ac.uk (probity.mcc.ac.uk [130.88.200.94])
	by snowdrop.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA21137
	for <britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk>; Tue, 29 Jun 1999 11:24:53 +0100 (BST)
Received: from ccg.acu.man.ac.uk ([130.88.17.200])
	by probity.mcc.ac.uk with smtp (Exim 1.92 #3)
	for britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk
	id 10yv4N-000N3j-00; Tue, 29 Jun 1999 11:24:52 +0100
Received: from ccMail by ccg.acu.man.ac.uk (ccMail Link to SMTP R8.20.00.25)
    id AA930651921; Tue, 29 Jun 1999 11:25:29 GMT
Message-Id: <9906299306.AA930651921@ccg.acu.man.ac.uk>
X-Mailer: ccMail Link to SMTP R8.20.00.25
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 1999 11:23:41 GMT
From: "Rob Mitchell"<Rob.Mitchell@man.ac.uk>
To: <britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk>
Subject: RE: RULE QUESTION 
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Description: "cc:Mail Note Part"
Sender: owner-britdisc@warwick.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk

>So can
>some one clarify the issue, and would it make a
>difference if the same thing happened but I was
>in-field? 

as happened in the final against Chevron.

rob 

>
>===
>Wigsy
>22,JTM,DAD, EX-BOUFFANT