From britdisc-owner@csv.warwick.ac.uk  Tue Sep  7 18:44:53 1999
Received: by pansy.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) id SAA04763
	for britdisc-outgoing; Tue, 7 Sep 1999 18:43:35 +0100 (BST)
Received: from snowdrop.csv.warwick.ac.uk (snowdrop [137.205.192.31])
	by pansy.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA04757
	for <britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk>; Tue, 7 Sep 1999 18:43:33 +0100 (BST)
Received: from server1.screaming.net (IDENT:root@server1.screaming.net [212.49.224.2])
	by snowdrop.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA14968
	for <britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk>; Tue, 7 Sep 1999 18:43:18 +0100 (BST)
Received: from simon (dyn59-ras16.screaming.net [212.49.239.59] (may be forged))
	by server1.screaming.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id TAA22289;
	Tue, 7 Sep 1999 19:01:59 +0100
Message-ID: <009601bef958$d344eae0$3bef31d4@simon>
From: "Simon P Barlow" <dgcltd@dgcltd.screaming.net>
To: <britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk>
Cc: "Leicester Ultimate Club" <red@ultimateweb.co.uk>,
        "HUGHES, Chris" <CHughes@chelt.ac.uk>
Subject: nationals
Date: Tue, 7 Sep 1999 18:44:14 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="----=_NextPart_000_007F_01BEF960.FBBE9360"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300
X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
Sender: owner-britdisc@warwick.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------=_NextPart_000_007F_01BEF960.FBBE9360
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Ben & Chris

My comments were meant slightly tongue in cheek to put forward the point =
that tournament directors/clubs make far too much profit out of a =
tourney .And how the price of entry to tournaments has increased =
considerably over the past couple of years since the introduction of the =
"compulsory tournaments".
I feel personally that if / when the UK Ultimate community decide to =
form the BUA to take over from the BUF, then when these compulsory =
tournaments in the future are put on then all the profits/less =
reasonable expenses, should go back to the BUA instead of the present =
situation that we have found ourselves in where certain individuals =
profit. Before you say BUF TAX let me point out that I feel this rate =
needs to be increased.
And as to your comment Ben about Victoria park being free!! You told me =
that you didn't have to pay for tour 1 as Leicester council =
decided/never asked for the money after the event. And Red never gave =
anyone any money back!!! (so did you make =A350 for every pitch you =
didn't pay for last time).
I'm not bothered as these days you don't get anything for free and if =
they do it again this time then you can consider yourselves luckier/ =
(Richer)  !!!
Also doesn't one of the Red players work for Leicester council??? Red =
tape , Lost invoices and all that !!!!
And by the way how many teams did bid for this years nationals!! apart =
from "Leicester city council"

Si.b      now nursing my hands after having my knuckles rapped

P.S I know how difficult it is to run Tournaments as I have run many =
tennis (week long) tournaments that's why I don't want to run an =
ultimate one as I know how many moaning players there are in our =
wonderful sport.

Ben I now expect pooper scoupers by every pitch !!=20

------=_NextPart_000_007F_01BEF960.FBBE9360
Content-Type: text/html;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content=3D"text/html; charset=3Diso-8859-1" =
http-equiv=3DContent-Type>
<META content=3D"MSHTML 5.00.2314.1000" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2>
<DIV>Ben & Chris</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>My comments were meant slightly tongue in cheek to put forward the =
point=20
that tournament directors/clubs make far too much profit out of a =
tourney=20
.And how the price of entry to tournaments has increased considerably =
over the=20
past couple of years since the introduction of the "compulsory=20
tournaments".</DIV>
<DIV>I feel personally that if / when the UK Ultimate =
community decide=20
to form the BUA to take over from the BUF, then when =
these=20
compulsory tournaments in the future are put on then all the =
profits/less=20
reasonable expenses, should go back to the BUA instead of the =
present=20
situation that we have found ourselves in where certain individuals =
profit.=20
Before you say BUF TAX let me point out that I feel this rate needs to =
be=20
increased.</DIV>
<DIV>And as to your comment Ben about Victoria park being free!! You =
told me=20
that you didn't have to pay for tour 1 as Leicester council =
decided/never asked=20
for the money after the event. And Red never gave anyone any money =
back!!!=20
(so did you make =A350 for every pitch you didn't pay for last =
time).</DIV>
<DIV>I'm not bothered as these days you don't get anything for free and =
if they=20
do it again this time then you can consider yourselves luckier/ =
(Richer) =20
!!!</DIV>
<DIV>Also doesn't one of the Red players work for Leicester council??? =
Red tape=20
, Lost invoices and all that !!!!</DIV>
<DIV>And by the way how many teams did bid for this years nationals!! =
apart from=20
"Leicester city council"</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Si.b      now nursing my hands after having my =
knuckles=20
rapped</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>P.S I know how difficult it is to run Tournaments as I have run =
many tennis=20
(week long) tournaments that's why I don't want to run an ultimate one =
as I know=20
how many moaning players there are in our wonderful sport.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Ben I now expect pooper scoupers by every pitch !!=20
</DIV></FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>

------=_NextPart_000_007F_01BEF960.FBBE9360--