From britdisc-owner@csv.warwick.ac.uk Tue Mar 4 18:00:01 1997 Received: from thistle.csv.warwick.ac.uk by pansy.csv.warwick.ac.uk with ESMTP id IAA27313; Tue, 4 Mar 1997 08:46:09 GMT Received: by thistle.csv.warwick.ac.uk id IAA21996; Tue, 4 Mar 1997 08:39:41 GMT Received: from pansy.csv.warwick.ac.uk by thistle.csv.warwick.ac.uk with ESMTP id SAA12794; Mon, 3 Mar 1997 18:53:38 GMT Received: from stone.dcs.warwick.ac.uk by pansy.csv.warwick.ac.uk with ESMTP id SAA28592; Mon, 3 Mar 1997 18:53:36 GMT Received: from mail.dcs.warwick.ac.uk by stone.dcs.warwick.ac.uk; Mon, 3 Mar 1997 15:00:25 GMT Received: from pansy.csv.warwick.ac.uk by mail.dcs.warwick.ac.uk; Mon, 3 Mar 1997 15:00:23 GMT Received: from ritig1.rit.reuters.com by pansy.csv.warwick.ac.uk with SMTP id PAA15332; Mon, 3 Mar 1997 15:00:10 GMT Received: from ritig4.rit.reuters.com by ritig1.rit.reuters.com; (5.65v3.2/1.1.8.2/14Sep94-0947PM) id AA07204; Mon, 3 Mar 1997 09:58:11 -0500 Received: from mr.rit.reuters.com by RITIG4.RIT.REUTERS.COM (PMDF V5.1-7 #7805) id <01IG28G4YLWG00529X@RITIG4.RIT.REUTERS.COM> for owner-britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk; Mon, 3 Mar 1997 09:57:58 EST Received: with PMDF-MR; Mon, 03 Mar 1997 14:58:47 +0000 (GMT) Mr-Received: by mta REC.MUAS; Relayed; Mon, 03 Mar 1997 14:58:47 +0000 Mr-Received: by mta RE6; Relayed; Mon, 03 Mar 1997 14:58:48 +0000 Mr-Received: by mta RITIG4; Relayed; Mon, 03 Mar 1997 14:57:50 +0000 Disclose-Recipients: prohibited Date: Mon, 03 Mar 1997 14:58:47 +0000 (GMT) From: Patrick Moore 5884 <patrick.moore@reuters.com> Subject: E-mail whinge! In-Reply-To: <199703031326.NAA11267@newton.leeds.amsta> To: owner-britdisc <owner-britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk> Message-Id: <7847581403031997/A54832/RE6/11B31BBA2F00*@MHS> Autoforwarded: false Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII Importance: normal Priority: normal Sensitivity: Company-Confidential Ua-Content-Id: 11B31BBA2F00 X400-Mts-Identifier: [;7847581403031997/A54832/RE6] Hop-Count: 2 Sender: owner-britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk Precedence: bulk Si (Hill, I assume) wrote: >PLEASE REPLY DIRECT TO ME ON THIS EMAIL - (ie not to BritDisc) >or by phone 0113 289 0971. However he then neglected to provide a return e-mail address. Is this vanity? Does he believe himself to be so well known within the British ultimate scene that reminding us of his e-mail address is unnecessary? Or is he just taking the piss? Or perhaps it's that hardly anyone else ever bothers to append their e-mail address, forcing anybody that wishes to reply to a mail to direct their response to the entire BritDisc mailing list! Please, please, get into the habit of ending your postings with a return address. I'm sure nobody needs any MORE unwanted e-mail. Whinge over. If anybody feels inclined to flame me over this, my address is at the bottom. PLEASE don't inflict it on the rest of BritDisc. Muchas gracias. Patrick P.S. Only kidding Si - I could have written this any one of a dozen times in the last few weeks. Your mail just happened to be the proverbial straw that broke the camel's back. -- patrick.moore@reuters.com