From britdisc-owner@csv.warwick.ac.uk  Mon May 22 14:01:50 2000
Received: (from daemon@localhost)
	by pansy.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.10.1/8.9.3) id e4MCujm20673
	for britdisc-outgoing; Mon, 22 May 2000 13:56:45 +0100 (BST)
Received: from daffodil.csv.warwick.ac.uk (root@daffodil [137.205.192.30])
	by pansy.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.10.1/8.9.3) with ESMTP id e4MCud120629
	for <britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk>; Mon, 22 May 2000 13:56:40 +0100 (BST)
Received: from mailgw.chelt.ac.uk (mailgw.chelt.ac.uk [194.81.184.203])
	by daffodil.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.10.1/8.9.3) with ESMTP id e4MCudV28778
	for <britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk>; Mon, 22 May 2000 13:56:39 +0100 (BST)
Received: from exchpk02.chelt.ac.uk (unverified) by mailgw.chelt.ac.uk
 (Content Technologies SMTPRS 2.0.15) with ESMTP id <B0002786962@mailgw.chelt.ac.uk>;
 Mon, 22 May 2000 13:56:13 +0100
Received: by exchpk02.chelt.ac.uk with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0)
	id <HQTTQWX1>; Mon, 22 May 2000 13:56:38 +0100
Message-Id: <8102C4585310D211858D0060B01A41330170E686@exchpk02.chelt.ac.uk>
From: "HUGHES, Chris" <CHughes@chelt.ac.uk>
To: britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk,
   "'James Hewitson'"
	 <james.hewitson@Zurich.co.uk>
Subject: RE: Tour 2 results
Date: Mon, 22 May 2000 13:56:30 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0)
Content-Type: text/plain
Sender: owner-britdisc@warwick.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk

Yes; you can all have clarification of what happened, what it means and what
will happen. But later. I'm not paid to be an ultimate administrator /
player, and unfortunately sometimes, it comes second in my list of
priorities.

Chris
DoC

> ----------
> From: 	James Hewitson[SMTP:james.hewitson@Zurich.co.uk]
> Sent: 	22 May 2000 13:13
> To: 	britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk
> Subject: 	Re: Tour 2 results
> 
> From: "James Hewitson" <james.hewitson@Zurich.co.uk>
> To: "britdisc" <britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk>
> Subject: Re: Tour 2 results
> Date: Mon, 22 May 2000 12:32:26 +0100
> 
> Can we have a clarification from someone (I'm guessing DoC) on the U8
> points
> position, the tour black-list, etc in the event of a team turning up and
> electing (some may suggest sensibly) not to play due to "un suitable"
> playing
> conditions ?
> 
> Balti
> BAF 34
> 
>