From britdisc-owner@csv.warwick.ac.uk Mon May 22 15:15:06 2000 Received: (from daemon@localhost) by pansy.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.10.1/8.9.3) id e4MECFE20627 for britdisc-outgoing; Mon, 22 May 2000 15:12:15 +0100 (BST) Received: from snowdrop.csv.warwick.ac.uk (root@snowdrop [137.205.192.31]) by pansy.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.10.1/8.9.3) with ESMTP id e4MECC120614 for <britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk>; Mon, 22 May 2000 15:12:13 +0100 (BST) Received: from mh-a03.dmz.another.com (vs-a01.funmail.co.uk [212.62.7.9]) by snowdrop.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.10.1/8.9.3) with SMTP id e4MECBU09047 for <britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk>; Mon, 22 May 2000 15:12:11 +0100 (BST) Received: (qmail 12471 invoked from network); 22 May 2000 14:12:10 -0000 Received: from www-a20.backend.funmail.co.uk (HELO www-a20) (172.16.100.20) by mh-a03.backend.another.com with SMTP; 22 May 2000 14:12:10 -0000 Message-ID: <15087429.959004725431.JavaMail.root@smtp.backend.another.com> Date: Mon, 22 May 2000 15:12:05 +0100 (GMT+01:00) From: bruce@pointblank.co.uk To: britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk Subject: RE: Tour 2 results Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="18281307.959004725391.JavaMail.root@www-a20" X-Funmail-UID: 268015 X-Senders-IP: unknown Sender: owner-britdisc@warwick.ac.uk Precedence: bulk --18281307.959004725391.JavaMail.root@www-a20 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=646 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Although I (probably) agree with the decisions made regarding Catch, this d= oes greatly effect the other teams in the tournament, especially those in t= he 13 downwards area. If Catch are treated as if they had never entered, su= rely everyone else should be treated as if Catch had never entered. Where d= oes this leave the teams placed in the aforementioned positions regarding t= heir Tour points? >From the posted positions, 12th place has been left blank. Have those point= s vanished? More importantly, if everyone below 12th moves up a place, can = someone from Nightfever please post us our plate trophy ;-) Bruce=20 Point Blank -----Original Message----- >From : ANDY COTGREAVE <acotgreave@rm.com> To : britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk Date : 22 May 2000 14:20:11 Subject : RE: Tour 2 results From: ANDY COTGREAVE <acotgreave@rm.com> >To: =93'James Hewitson'=93 <james.hewitson@Zurich.co.uk>, > britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk >Subject: RE: Tour 2 results >Date: Mon, 22 May 2000 14:05:08 +0100 > >Hi all, > >Well, it was an interesting weekend, and the u8 committee had some work to= do. > >Catch 22 withdrew, and came to the committee with a couple of proposals: > >1. That the tournament be declared void - no tour points would be allocate= d >to ANY team due to the un suitability of the pitches >2. That Catch do not get penalised by withdrawing >3. That they get a refund for the tournament. > >As a committee, we didn't agree with the first proposal. However, we did >recognise that, yes, the pitches were not suitable for a Tour tournament. >Also, as one of the founding principles of the tour was to guarantee high >quality pitches (it's in the rules!), we agreed that any team had the righ= t >to withdraw from the tournament. > >However, to declare the tournament void was certainly not going to please >the rest of the 29 teams who decided to play on the pitches. > >Because we do recognise the right of Catch to withdraw, they will not be >penalised in the same way as if they had pulled out at the last minute due >to other circumstances (eg not having enough players). The way that we >agreed was to treat Catch as if they had not ever entered this tournament. >They get no points for Tour II, therefore, and are seeded for Tour III >based on their Tour I position, as written in the rules. > >As for their refund, we felt that because this was a BUF sponsored >tournament, that this would have to be discussed with them. We didn't get = a >decision on this by the end of the weekend, as far as I am aware. > >I hope that makes things clearer. We tried to make the best decision in >light of the situation and the Tour rules. > >Andy > > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: James Hewitson [mailto:james.hewitson@Zurich.co.uk] >> Sent: Monday, May 22, 2000 1:14 PM >> To: britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk >> Subject: Re: Tour 2 results >> >> >> From: =93James Hewitson=93 <james.hewitson@Zurich.co.uk> >> To: =93britdisc=93 <britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk> >> Subject: Re: Tour 2 results >> Date: Mon, 22 May 2000 12:32:26 +0100 >> >> Can we have a clarification from someone (I'm guessing DoC) >> on the U8 points >> position, the tour black-list, etc in the event of a team >> turning up and >> electing (some may suggest sensibly) not to play due to =93un >> suitable=93 playing >> conditions ? >> >> Balti >> BAF 34 >> >> > > >STANDARD DISCLAIMER: This message is confidential. You should not copy it = or >disclose its contents to anyone. You may use and apply the information onl= y >for the intended purpose. Internet communications are not secure and >therefore RM does not accept legal responsibility for the contents of this >message. Any views or opinions presented are only those of the author and >not those of RM. If this email has come to you in error please delete it a= nd >any attachments. > > > Be whoever you want to be with another.com Just click here: http://another.com/jump.jsp?destDesc=3Danother.com/login.j= sp?sig=3D390 --18281307.959004725391.JavaMail.root@www-a20--