From britdisc-owner@csv.warwick.ac.uk Tue May 23 08:30:20 2000 Received: (from daemon@localhost) by pansy.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.10.1/8.9.3) id e4N7S9104422 for britdisc-outgoing; Tue, 23 May 2000 08:28:09 +0100 (BST) Received: from daffodil.csv.warwick.ac.uk (root@daffodil [137.205.192.30]) by pansy.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.10.1/8.9.3) with ESMTP id e4N7S8p04410 for <britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk>; Tue, 23 May 2000 08:28:08 +0100 (BST) Received: from gatekeeper.eaglestar.co.uk (gatekeeper.eaglestar.co.uk [192.147.228.29]) by daffodil.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.10.1/8.9.3) with SMTP id e4N7S6V24533 for <britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk>; Tue, 23 May 2000 08:28:07 +0100 (BST) Received: by gatekeeper.eaglestar.co.uk id AA19333 (InterLock SMTP Gateway 3.0 for britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk); Tue, 23 May 2000 08:26:53 +0100 Received: by gatekeeper.eaglestar.co.uk (Internal Mail Agent-1); Tue, 23 May 2000 08:26:53 +0100 Message-Id: <001a01bfc488$c1621450$be17010a@w046901> From: "James Hewitson" <james.hewitson@Zurich.co.uk> To: "Britdisc" <britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk> Subject: Fw: Tour 2 results Date: Tue, 23 May 2000 08:30:22 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-Msmail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3612.1700 X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3612.1700 Sender: owner-britdisc@warwick.ac.uk Precedence: bulk On 22nd May Andy Cotgreave wrote : >The way that we agreed was to treat Catch as if they had not ever entered this tournament. >They get no points for Tour II, therefore, and are seeded for Tour III based on their Tour I position, as written in the rules. I might have missed the answer to this question in the pile of e-mails sat in my Inbox this morning but: Can we have a clarification on whether the points for 12th place have simply disappeared or whether those teams in 13th to 29th places simply move up a spot ? Balti BAF 34