From britdisc-owner@csv.warwick.ac.uk  Tue May 23 08:30:20 2000
Received: (from daemon@localhost)
	by pansy.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.10.1/8.9.3) id e4N7S9104422
	for britdisc-outgoing; Tue, 23 May 2000 08:28:09 +0100 (BST)
Received: from daffodil.csv.warwick.ac.uk (root@daffodil [137.205.192.30])
	by pansy.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.10.1/8.9.3) with ESMTP id e4N7S8p04410
	for <britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk>; Tue, 23 May 2000 08:28:08 +0100 (BST)
Received: from gatekeeper.eaglestar.co.uk (gatekeeper.eaglestar.co.uk [192.147.228.29])
	by daffodil.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.10.1/8.9.3) with SMTP id e4N7S6V24533
	for <britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk>; Tue, 23 May 2000 08:28:07 +0100 (BST)
Received: by gatekeeper.eaglestar.co.uk id AA19333
  (InterLock SMTP Gateway 3.0 for britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk);
  Tue, 23 May 2000 08:26:53 +0100
Received: by gatekeeper.eaglestar.co.uk (Internal Mail Agent-1);
  Tue, 23 May 2000 08:26:53 +0100
Message-Id: <001a01bfc488$c1621450$be17010a@w046901>
From: "James Hewitson" <james.hewitson@Zurich.co.uk>
To: "Britdisc" <britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk>
Subject: Fw: Tour 2 results
Date: Tue, 23 May 2000 08:30:22 +0100
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-Msmail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3612.1700
X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3612.1700
Sender: owner-britdisc@warwick.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk

On 22nd May Andy Cotgreave wrote :

>The way that we agreed was to treat Catch as if they had not ever entered
this tournament.
>They get no points for Tour II, therefore, and are seeded for Tour III
based on their Tour I position, as written in the rules.

I might have missed the answer to this question in the pile of e-mails sat
in my Inbox this morning but:

Can we have a clarification on whether the points for 12th place have simply
disappeared or whether those teams in 13th to 29th places simply move up a
spot ?

Balti
BAF 34