From britdisc-owner@csv.warwick.ac.uk  Fri May 26 18:18:12 2000
Received: (from daemon@localhost)
	by pansy.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.10.1/8.9.3) id e4QHGtR23205
	for britdisc-outgoing; Fri, 26 May 2000 18:16:55 +0100 (BST)
Received: from daffodil.csv.warwick.ac.uk (root@daffodil [137.205.192.30])
	by pansy.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.10.1/8.9.3) with ESMTP id e4QHGrp23191
	for <britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk>; Fri, 26 May 2000 18:16:53 +0100 (BST)
Received: from judy.ic.ac.uk (judy.ic.ac.uk [155.198.5.28])
	by daffodil.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.10.1/8.9.3) with ESMTP id e4QHGgV15715
	for <britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk>; Fri, 26 May 2000 18:16:48 +0100 (BST)
Received: from juliet.ic.ac.uk ([155.198.5.4])
	by judy.ic.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 2.12 #1)
	id 12vNiz-0000in-00
	for britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk; Fri, 26 May 2000 18:16:41 +0100
Received: from icex1.cc.ic.ac.uk ([155.198.3.1])
	by juliet.ic.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 2.12 #1)
	id 12vNj2-0001uN-00
	for britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk; Fri, 26 May 2000 18:16:44 +0100
Received: by icex1.cc.ic.ac.uk with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
	id <KKSWMY9G>; Fri, 26 May 2000 18:16:40 +0100
Message-ID: <0846B011B9A4D111A1EE006097DA4FCE0271656B@icex1.cc.ic.ac.uk>
From: "White, Tom" <tom.white@ic.ac.uk>
To: "'britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk'" <britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk>
Subject: hmm
Date: Fri, 26 May 2000 18:16:39 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Sender: owner-britdisc@warwick.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk

 
hmmm, paul my good man:

if you had been reading britdisc, you would have noticed that everyone
already knows everything you want to say, which makes your mail redundant.

as for sarcasm, I was not saying that anyone should use it, but was making a
comment about people who reply to sarcasm thinking its not what it is, if
you get what I mean.

(eg, someones remark about catch getting spirit, warrented the reply "they
weren't there").

anyways, I got some vids to watch, and some pizza to eat.

laters

tom

ps I have a complaint to make about dereks complaint about complaints, the
pictures were to small!!