From britdisc-owner@csv.warwick.ac.uk Tue May 30 16:20:49 2000
Received: (from daemon@localhost)
by pansy.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.10.1/8.9.3) id e4UF97A15291
for britdisc-outgoing; Tue, 30 May 2000 16:09:07 +0100 (BST)
Received: from snowdrop.csv.warwick.ac.uk (root@snowdrop [137.205.192.31])
by pansy.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.10.1/8.9.3) with ESMTP id e4UF6Gp14087
for <britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk>; Tue, 30 May 2000 16:06:16 +0100 (BST)
Received: from mta2-svc.virgin.net (mta2-svc.virgin.net [194.168.54.143])
by snowdrop.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.10.1/8.9.3) with ESMTP id e4UF6FU17184
for <britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk>; Tue, 30 May 2000 16:06:15 +0100 (BST)
Received: from zqkciqap ([62.252.40.224]) by mta2-svc.virgin.net
(InterMail vM.4.01.02.27 201-229-119-110) with SMTP
id <20000530150521.SLIF22022.mta2-svc.virgin.net@zqkciqap>
for <britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk>; Tue, 30 May 2000 16:05:21 +0100
Message-ID: <005501bfca49$063dccc0$e028fc3e@zqkciqap>
From: "ADAM BATCHELOR" <adam.batchelor@virgin.net>
To: <britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk>
References: <20000526165427.23947.qmail@hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: Catch 22
Date: Tue, 30 May 2000 16:09:16 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
Sender: owner-britdisc@warwick.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk
Si and Catch 22
Well done. Right decision. In your position I would have done the same
thing.
Good restraint when dealing with the less well informed among the Ultimate
world. You must suffer fools far better than me.
Good luck in the rest of the tour
Adam Fatboy Batchelor
Ex Druid current Headrush
PS We benefited with a bye on our top 8 crossover but we did play and beat
Hamerage in our 5-8 semi final.
----- Original Message -----
From: Simon Barry <sibarry@hotmail.com>
To: <britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk>
Sent: Friday, May 26, 2000 5:54 PM
Subject: Re: Tour 2 Results
> >Wed 24 May
>
> >>Si Hill wrote:
> >>I'm quite sure that Catch 22 will be
> >>more than happy to put its seeding on the line against any of the
> >>displaced
> >>teams (no time-wasters please).
>
> >shock horror...no takers?
>
> >P
>
>
> >Fri 26 May
>
> >Si Hill wrote:
> >That was a question about Tour 2. Where have you been? We didn't play
at
> >Tour 2.
>
> >I'm afraid I can't actually remember who you are, but I think you must
play
> >for Hammerage (I guess that the one or two games that we get each year
are
> >pretty short).
>
>
> The sympathy I had for Catch 22 after the weekend has completely
evaporated
> in the face of this witless and uncalled-for posturing.
>
> If you really want to put your seeding on the line (which you clearly
don't)
> then why don't you start T3 at 12th and work your way back up.
>
> shock horror...no takers?
>
> Si B
>
> ps - I don't know you either and no, I don't play for Hammerage.
>
>
> ________________________________________________________________________
> Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com
>