From britdisc-owner@csv.warwick.ac.uk  Mon Feb 12 17:06:55 2001
Received: (from daemon@localhost)
	by pansy.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.10.1/8.9.3) id f1CH41f00491
	for britdisc-outgoing; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 17:04:01 GMT
Received: from snowdrop.csv.warwick.ac.uk (root@snowdrop [137.205.192.31])
	by pansy.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.10.1/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f1CH3wh00477
	for <britdisc-real@pansy.csv.warwick.ac.uk>; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 17:03:58 GMT
Received: from rw-gw-02.BroadVision.com (bv200.broadvision.com [198.211.204.200] (may be forged))
	by snowdrop.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.10.1/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f1CH3PY08854
	for <britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk>; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 17:03:40 GMT
Received: by rw-gw-02.broadvision.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
	id <D85AMYGT>; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 09:02:53 -0800
Message-ID: <45C4368325C2D411898E00062938B3E827F3CB@uk-msg-01.broadvision.com>
From: "Travers, Neil" <Neil.Travers@BroadVision.com>
To: Britdisc <britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk>
Subject: RE: BUF Events Reminder
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 09:02:10 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Sender: owner-britdisc@warwick.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk

The main question is, how easy/difficult would this be for the person who
runs the diary/reminder. If it is too much effort to do this, then there's
no point in trying to argue about whether to do it or not.


I'd vote for splitting them up.  I don't want to see golf stuff and I would
imagine some golfers don't want to see Ultimate stuff.

If there were two separate reminders, they could still both be posted to
britdisc and people could choose which one(s) they want to read. The only
negative (for the reader) is it is more difficult to see clashes between
Golf and Ultimate.


-- 
Neil Travers