From britdisc-owner@csv.warwick.ac.uk  Thu Feb 22 16:54:19 2001
Received: (from daemon@localhost)
	by pansy.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.10.1/8.9.3) id f1MGpBn17563
	for britdisc-outgoing; Thu, 22 Feb 2001 16:51:11 GMT
Received: from snowdrop.csv.warwick.ac.uk (root@snowdrop [137.205.192.31])
	by pansy.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.10.1/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f1MGp6h17507
	for <britdisc-real@pansy.csv.warwick.ac.uk>; Thu, 22 Feb 2001 16:51:07 GMT
Received: from dns1.tctrust.net (lovelace.tctrust.net [212.250.101.3])
	by snowdrop.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.10.1/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f1MGp1Y15981
	for <britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk>; Thu, 22 Feb 2001 16:51:01 GMT
Received: from rmproxy1.landau-forte.org.uk (proxy.landau-forte.org.uk [10.20.117.1])
	by dns1.tctrust.net (8.9.3+Sun/8.8.8) with SMTP id QAA29972
	for <britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk>; Thu, 22 Feb 2001 16:52:00 GMT
Received: from WR_PEPA1 (WR_PEPA1 [192.168.1.142]) by rmproxy1.landau-forte.org.uk (NTMail 3.02.13) with ESMTP id ga031128 for <britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk>; Thu, 22 Feb 2001 16:49:16 +0000
Message-ID: <002f01c09cef$1c7f5e80$8e01a8c0@wrpepa1>
From: "unwin" <unwin@landau-forte.org.uk>
To: "Nicole Roberts" <mmu32@central.susx.ac.uk>, <britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk>
References: <E14Vxjm-0005Xu-00@rinka.central.susx.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: RE: Tour Dates
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2001 16:46:58 -0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="----=_NextPart_000_002C_01C09CEF.12480340"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2014.211
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2014.211
Sender: owner-britdisc@warwick.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------=_NextPart_000_002C_01C09CEF.12480340
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I would personally like to know how many of the individuals expressing =
their opinions on Britdisc have contributed to the organisation of =
tournaments or the tour itself on any level aside from reaping the =
benefits of others labour.  To name Ruth's team and infer anything, =
joking or not Nicola, is shameful.  One member of Ruth's team is BUF =
president,  another I believe is integral in the maintenance of britdisc =
itself, another has recently organised Junior Nationals and is now =
organising tour 2 in Banbury (a very central location) and the team =
itself have run numerous tournaments including Nationals.  Hand on heart =
does the team really deserve anything but a vote of thanks.  Here's my =
tuppence, go organise a tournament.

----- Original Message -----=20
From: Nicole Roberts <mmu32@central.susx.ac.uk>
To: Gareth Goo <gareth_goo@hotmail.com>; <britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk>
Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2001 3:34 PM
Subject: Re: RE: Tour Dates


> And while we're talking about numbers, if we look at the co-ed tour
> which admittedly is somewhat smaller, at nationals one of the teams =
was
> playing iron man, and the team consisted of some of the best players =
in
> british ultimate, so surely we cannot relate the number of players to
> the quality of ultimate .  There has also been many instances in the
> tour events where the top teams have only fielded a 8 or 9 strong =
team.=20
> (Maybe red just need to work on their fitness...)
>=20
> I do agree that something needs to be done about the tour, but
> ostricising players because of their financial position does nothing =
to
> improve the quality of british ultimate.
>=20
> Just my tuppence worth (as I feel there will be a collection of =
coppers
> soon)
>=20
> Nicole
> mohawks
>=20

------=_NextPart_000_002C_01C09CEF.12480340
Content-Type: text/html;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content=3D"text/html; charset=3Diso-8859-1" =
http-equiv=3DContent-Type>
<META content=3D"MSHTML 5.00.2614.3401" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>I would personally like to know how =
many of the=20
individuals expressing their opinions on Britdisc have contributed to =
the=20
organisation of tournaments or the tour itself on any level aside from =
reaping=20
the benefits of others labour.  To name Ruth's team and infer =
anything,=20
joking or not Nicola, is shameful.  One member of Ruth's team is =
BUF=20
president,  another I believe is integral in the maintenance of =
britdisc=20
itself, another has recently organised Junior Nationals and is now =
organising=20
tour 2 in Banbury (a very central location) and the team itself have run =

numerous tournaments including Nationals.  Hand on heart does the =
team=20
really deserve anything but a vote of thanks.  Here's my tuppence, =
go=20
organise a tournament.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>----- Original Message ----- </FONT>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>From: Nicole Roberts <<A=20
href=3D"mailto:mmu32@central.susx.ac.uk">mmu32@central.susx.ac.uk</A>>=
</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>To: Gareth Goo <<A=20
href=3D"mailto:gareth_goo@hotmail.com">gareth_goo@hotmail.com</A>>; =
<<A=20
href=3D"mailto:britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk">britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk</A>=
></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2001 3:34=20
PM</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Subject: Re: RE: Tour =
Dates</FONT></DIV></DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>> And while we're talking =
about=20
numbers, if we look at the co-ed tour<BR>> which admittedly is =
somewhat=20
smaller, at nationals one of the teams was<BR>> playing iron man, and =
the=20
team consisted of some of the best players in<BR>> british ultimate, =
so=20
surely we cannot relate the number of players to<BR>> the quality of =
ultimate=20
.  There has also been many instances in the<BR>> tour events =
where the=20
top teams have only fielded a 8 or 9 strong team. <BR>> (Maybe red =
just need=20
to work on their fitness...)<BR>> <BR>> I do agree that something =
needs to=20
be done about the tour, but<BR>> ostricising players because of their =

financial position does nothing to<BR>> improve the quality of =
british=20
ultimate.<BR>> <BR>> Just my tuppence worth (as I feel there will =
be a=20
collection of coppers<BR>> soon)<BR>> <BR>> Nicole<BR>>=20
mohawks<BR>> </FONT></BODY></HTML>

------=_NextPart_000_002C_01C09CEF.12480340--