From britdisc-owner@csv.warwick.ac.uk  Tue Feb 27 13:31:38 2001
Received: (from daemon@localhost)
	by pansy.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.10.1/8.9.3) id f1RDSRG06410
	for britdisc-outgoing; Tue, 27 Feb 2001 13:28:27 GMT
Received: from daffodil.csv.warwick.ac.uk (root@daffodil [137.205.192.30])
	by pansy.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.10.1/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f1RDSPh06401
	for <britdisc-real@pansy.csv.warwick.ac.uk>; Tue, 27 Feb 2001 13:28:25 GMT
Received: from smtp5.uk1.bibliotech.net (smtp5.uk1.bibliotech.net [212.57.34.104])
	by daffodil.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.10.1/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f1RDSIF14157
	for <britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk>; Tue, 27 Feb 2001 13:28:19 GMT
Received: from pmweb6.uk1.bibliotech.net (pmweb6.uk1.bibliotech.net [212.57.34.113])
	by smtp5.uk1.bibliotech.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA27654
	for <britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk>; Tue, 27 Feb 2001 13:28:17 GMT
Received: (from pmweb@localhost)
	by pmweb6.uk1.bibliotech.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id NAA00852;
	Tue, 27 Feb 2001 13:28:17 GMT
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Disposition: inline
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: MIME-tools 4.104 (Entity 4.117)
From: "Wayne Retter" <wretter@postmaster.co.uk>
Subject: Re: Students & the Tour (was Tour Dates etc.)
To: britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2001 13:28:17 +0000
Reply-To: w.retter@bigfoot.com
X-Postmaster: Sent from Postmaster http://www.postmaster.co.uk/,
    the world's premier free web-based email service, based in London,
    England.
X-Postmaster-Trace: Account name: wretter; Local time: Tue Feb 27 13:28:17
    2001; Local host: pmweb6.uk1.bibliotech.net; Remote host: 62.172.72.66;
    Referer site: www.postmaster.co.uk
X-Complaints-To: Administrator@postmaster.co.uk
Message-Id: <PM.835.983280497@pmweb6.uk1.bibliotech.net>
Sender: owner-britdisc@warwick.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk


> are we all aware that there is an ex-student is now
> holidaying round the world  on profits made from the
> sheffield tour of 1999

If you're right, we are now... 

...and my congratulations go to that person.  Mostly for bothering to run the event in the first place, but with a healthy dose of "for getting away with it"!

Ok, we could all probably niggle about something at Sheffield, and there were definitely a few _comments_ about a couple of the pitches, but there was no noticable _outburst_ at the time (was there?) and it's way too late now...

But does anyone wonder why we haven't been back there ?

Does anyone wonder if the powers that be learned lessons from experience and have effectively now designated that particular Sheffield setup as "realistically too small" for that no. of pitches?


Here are some other definite financial facts, that I have a personal involvement in:

and a large chunk of the Ultimate participation that the Layout Dreams duo do is funded by the profits we make from the tournaments we run...

the Fluid Druids aim to (at least!) fully fund their entries to Indoor and Outdoor Nationals from the profits they make at Newport and RossOnWye tournaments, respectively.
  For a couple of years, all UK tournaments we entered were covered by the profits made by the tournaments we ran.
  In 1997, the Ross entry was jacked up (near doubled!) to provide us with some funding for WUCC - and we were still oversubscribed.

It seems to me that the current debate isn't so much "tournaments shouldn't make a profit" as "tournaments should appear to provide value for money"

What is "an acceptable level of profit", or, from the alternative perspective, what is "apparent value for money"

It's complicated by the "supply and demand" factor (my RossOnWye example earlier) and the "vicious circle" it generates... If people really want to play, they WILL pay whatever is necessary. Therefore, TDs charge more... teams pay more... TDs charge more...

But, as Paul Meaney is rightly concerned but poorly expressing, are the facilities provided actually any better??? Why should teams pay this much?

Answer: because, if they want to play, they either have to pay that much, or organise a more economical alternative.

However: If a team CAN go out and run a tournament in profit for £60 per team, WHY BOTHER when they can charge £80 and cover a whole host of other expenses?

For that matter, why aren't more teams doing this???


Hopefully, somewhere in my ramblings, there's some food for thought...


Wayne Retter
Fluid Druids
Layout Dreams
and fifth sub-level assistant to anybody that's asked questions on how to set up/run a tournament.

-- 
Wayne Retter
w.retter@bigfoot.com
mobile: +44/0-7970-903420
office: +44/0-1737-273655