From britdisc-owner@csv.warwick.ac.uk  Wed Feb 28 12:42:06 2001
Received: (from daemon@localhost)
	by pansy.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.10.1/8.9.3) id f1SCewA04252
	for britdisc-outgoing; Wed, 28 Feb 2001 12:40:58 GMT
Received: from snowdrop.csv.warwick.ac.uk (root@snowdrop [137.205.192.31])
	by pansy.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.10.1/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f1SCevh04241
	for <britdisc-real@pansy.csv.warwick.ac.uk>; Wed, 28 Feb 2001 12:40:57 GMT
Received: from anchor-sbs-2.mail.demon.net (anchor-sbs-2.mail.demon.net [194.159.243.144])
	by snowdrop.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.10.1/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f1SCevY19099
	for <britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk>; Wed, 28 Feb 2001 12:40:57 GMT
Received: from anchor-sbs-1.mail.demon.net ([194.159.243.143] helo=mail-1.sbs.demon.net)
	by anchor-sbs-2.mail.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 3.16 #1)
	id 14Y5uW-000FUb-02
	for britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk; Wed, 28 Feb 2001 12:40:52 +0000
Received: from sbs1459.customer.demon.com (server01.student-reservations.co.uk) [194.159.222.79] 
	by mail-1.sbs.demon.net with esmtp id 14Y5uW-000MwY-01; Wed, 28 Feb 2001 12:40:52 +0000
Received: by SERVER01 with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0)
	id <CJM6Y3VQ>; Wed, 28 Feb 2001 12:37:12 -0000
Message-ID: <F15CA8143F76D211A32A0000B4592FED1666C4@SERVER01>
From: Max Keogh <max@student-reservations.co.uk>
To: "'Britdisc' (E-mail)" <britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk>
Subject: FW: WINNERS DONT USE DRUGS
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2001 12:37:10 -0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0)
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Sender: owner-britdisc@warwick.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk

I think Tom intended this for Britdisc and not just me.

Max

p.s. Tom, I don't know Dan so can't comment one way or another as to his
personality. I only felt the tone of his e-mail was "a little arrogant"
nothing more.
p.p.s. Last you'll hear from me as I have other things to get on with and I
think I've made my point.

-----Original Message-----
From: White, Tom [mailto:tom.white@ic.ac.uk]
Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2001 12:26 PM
To: 'Max Keogh '
Subject: RE: WINNERS DONT USE DRUGS


 
yo,

well, mebbe dan is an arogant nasty guy, but whatever.

there IS a big difference between tournaments in this country, and its
pretty obvious which ones are serious, and which are more like freinds
organising a weekend of fun.  If you know your tourny is gonna be attended
by kids and their parents and be videod, it prolly wouldn't be a good idea
to promote illegal activities in the prizes.  But if you know all the people
going are adults, and they know what they are letting themselves in for, I
can't see a problem.

It would be foolish to harm the fun spirit of certain tournaments by
restricting everyone to a kinda "strict" format where the prizes are always
cups or badges etc.  This sort of thang could result in tournaments being
drug and alchohol free zones, which can't be a good thing.

Do people not think that by having a party on saturday night, they are
encouraging kids in the sport to get drunk, and have fun.  No one's
complained about that before, and its just as illegal to drink under aged as
it is to take drugs.

Anyways, have fun!


laters

tom  (S&G)


ps, snoochie boochie woochies