From britdisc-owner@csv.warwick.ac.uk Fri Mar 30 11:07:57 2001 Received: (from daemon@localhost) by pansy.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.10.1/8.9.3) id f2UA6gR08307 for britdisc-outgoing; Fri, 30 Mar 2001 11:06:42 +0100 (BST) Received: from snowdrop.csv.warwick.ac.uk (root@snowdrop [137.205.192.31]) by pansy.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.10.1/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f2UA6ex08282 for <britdisc-real@pansy.csv.warwick.ac.uk>; Fri, 30 Mar 2001 11:06:40 +0100 (BST) Received: from chalfont.mail.uk.easynet.net (chalfont.mail.uk.easynet.net [195.40.1.44]) by snowdrop.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.10.1/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f2UA6cZ04584 for <britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk>; Fri, 30 Mar 2001 11:06:39 +0100 (BST) Received: from qfy1r (unknown [195.172.242.158]) by chalfont.mail.uk.easynet.net (Postfix) with SMTP id A1A0BF81F0; Fri, 30 Mar 2001 11:06:28 +0100 (BST) Message-Id: <3.0.1.32.20010330110547.00e2ccb0@mail.technocom.com> X-Sender: 122469a@mail.technocom.com X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.1 (32) Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2001 11:05:47 +0100 To: "Jonathan Palmer" <jonathan.palmer@ic.ac.uk> From: Duncan McGowan <dmcg@technocom.com> Subject: Re: Indoor zone Cc: <britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk> In-Reply-To: <005901c0b8fe$3a7935c0$07d8883e@peter> References: <3AC449D7.EE1D0D44@ptc.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-britdisc@warwick.ac.uk Precedence: bulk it never worked for us anyway lets face it, maybe just banning uriel from playing it could be the key...... Duncan Ex-Uriel Discult/D Bob/Angels At 10:44 30/03/01 +0100, Jonathan Palmer wrote: >Yeah but on that reasoning, you could band zone D and insist you only score >from you own endzone with an upside down throw, certainly would be more >spectacular!! Lets face it the yanks don't always get it right. I've played >indoors in the states on a roller hockey pitch with keyhole endzones, stall >of 10 and bouncing of the walls was legit.......it Sucked!!! I say the way >we play it is just fine, zone rocks. > >Jon >Shrub > >P.S. Poor old Uriel if we did ban zone - they'd have to rethink their entire >defence.......... :-) > > > >----- Original Message ----- >From: Adriano Vitali <avitali@ptc.com> >To: <britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk> >Sent: Friday, March 30, 2001 9:54 AM >Subject: Indoor zone > > >> Just to quote another parallel with basketball. In the states, zone >> defence has been abolished, players are only allowed to defend man on >> man! This was done to quicken up the game and make it more spectacular. >> >> Please correct me if I'm wrong. >> >> VITO >> >> >> Adriano Vitali >> PTC - Technical Support >> http://www.ptc.com/support/index.htm >> > > >