From britdisc-owner@csv.warwick.ac.uk  Thu Jun  7 14:48:45 2001
Received: (from daemon@localhost)
	by pansy.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.11.3/8.11.3) id f57DjP504471
	for britdisc-outgoing; Thu, 7 Jun 2001 14:45:25 +0100 (BST)
Received: from snowdrop.csv.warwick.ac.uk (root@snowdrop [137.205.192.31])
	by pansy.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f57DjLp04453
	for <britdisc-real@pansy.csv.warwick.ac.uk>; Thu, 7 Jun 2001 14:45:21 +0100 (BST)
Received: from mailgw.chelt.ac.uk (mailgw.chelt.ac.uk [194.81.184.203])
	by snowdrop.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f57DjKt28800
	for <britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk>; Thu, 7 Jun 2001 14:45:20 +0100 (BST)
Received: from exchange.chelt.ac.uk (unverified) by mailgw.chelt.ac.uk
 (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.1.5) with ESMTP id <Tc251b8cb53ffbe1bf0@mailgw.chelt.ac.uk>;
 Thu, 7 Jun 2001 14:42:14 +0100
Received: by exchange.chelt.ac.uk with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
	id <ML1CG8P4>; Thu, 7 Jun 2001 14:42:05 +0100
Message-ID: <E8E2FD6D7B77D411A768009027E01DB301E19291@exchange.chelt.ac.uk>
From: "HUGHES, Chris" <CHughes@chelt.ac.uk>
To: "'Miranda Kuiper'" <miranda_kuiper@hotmail.com>,
   britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk
Subject: RE: ultimate rules, start stalling
Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2001 14:42:05 +0100 
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Sender: owner-britdisc@warwick.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk

The rules on stall are quite clear on a number of points:
You can start stalling the moment that a player has possession ie has
control of the disc, AND has established a pivot point; AND if you are
within 3m to initiate the stall count.

So you can start stalling the moment a player has landed from catching a
disc (if they use more than their three contacts you have a choice -
continue stalling or call travel)
If the player has laid out you can stall them before they get up.
However if a player lands in - but runs or slides out of bounds; you can
only stall once they return to the pitch
If a player picks the disc up you can start stalling the moment the put the
disc in play - so cleaning / drying the disc can be stalled (Although this
is at your discretion, so they may let you off if you let them off).
Remember that if you pick the disc up out of bounds, and walk it to the
sideline or end zone line the disc does not have to touched in by the
opposition, you can just start stalling once they establish a pivot foot.

If a player injures themselves during a catch or dive for the disc, remember
that the injury  time out, irrelevant of when it is called, occurs at the
time of the injury. So if you get the stall to seven before someone rolls
over after a layout to call a T/O the stall goes back to when they injured
themselves - ie on landing and so a stall of zero at the restart.

There are no WFDF rules about stalling a grounded disc before it is put into
play. They rules say that you must put the disc in play as soon as possible,
and cannot stand over the disc, but have no penalties to enforce if you do.
The rule on stalling a grounded disc was a UPA rule, that was removed after
a trial period.

Loop-Hole:
The WFDF rules state that you need to be within 3m to 'initiate' a stall
count. But doesn't say that you have stay within 3m to continue stalling. So
run to cover deep whilst continuing to stall loud enough so that the player
in possession can hear you (That is a requirement by the rules - so no
stalling under your breath). Good argument to ensue.
Somehow I don't think that this was the intention of the rules - as ever
SOTG applies above all else.

Chris
DoC

-----Original Message-----
From: Miranda Kuiper [mailto:miranda_kuiper@hotmail.com]
Sent: 07 June 2001 14:14
To: britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk
Subject: ultimate rules, start stalling


I am not much of a e-list writer, but this is annoying me so much I just 
want to settle this for once and for all.

I got a discussion on the pitch now a couple of times about the timing of 
starting stalling. Perhaps it's a UK thing but players around here tend to 
start stalling while the thrower-to-be is not in possession yet. The reason 
they come up with is "you are allowed to start stalling 3 meters away from 
the thrower, even if the thrower-to-be is not in possession of the disc 
yet."

Well maybe it's me, but you are only a thrower if you have possession of the

disc. See quote of WFDF rules:

4.10 The Thrower:
 A. A player may become "the thrower" by fielding a pull, receiving 
the disc from a teammate, intercepting a pass from an opponent, or by 
picking up the disc after a turnover. Whenever the disc is on the ground 
following a turnover, whether in or out-of-bounds, any player becoming 
offense may take possession of the disc and become the thrower.

So in my view you are only allowed to start stalling if the handler is in 
possession. And yes, it that case you may start on 3 m distance. See WFDF 
rules about possession and stalling:

404.12 The Receiver:
 A. Possession: A receiver gains possession by demonstrating 
sustained contact and control of a non-spinning disc while the receiver is 
on the ground and in-bounds

404.11B. Stalling: Once a marker is within 3 m of the thrower, he or she may

initiate a count. This consists of the marker calling, "Stalling," and then 
counting at one second intervals to ten.


I do know that at WC and EC a rules is used for preventing the game from any

delay. But I cannot find the rules on the WFDF site. Based on my memory that

rule allowed a defender to start stalling by touching the disc while the 
thrower-to-be had not touched the disc yet, in order to prevent delay in the

game. As I remember that rule, you had to restart stalling once the thrower 
became indeed a thrower by picking up the disc. Therefore offence was only 
allowed 10 sec's to get set up.

Perhaps somebody can get hold of this specific rule, so we will all know the

right way to start stalling. If we can find this rule, I also would like to 
know if this rule applyes only to WC and EC, or also to the Tours. Since 
they do not seem to be stated in the WFDF rules on the web-site. Once more, 
this e-mail is not to start an e-mail chain of reactions, but to settle this

for once and for all, because I prefer not to have this discussion on the 
pitch.

Cheers,
Miranda

_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.