From britdisc-owner@csv.warwick.ac.uk  Tue Jul 24 13:09:02 2001
Received: (from daemon@localhost)
	by pansy.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.11.3/8.11.3) id f6OC5hn09976
	for britdisc-outgoing; Tue, 24 Jul 2001 13:05:43 +0100 (BST)
Received: from snowdrop.csv.warwick.ac.uk (root@snowdrop [137.205.192.31])
	by pansy.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f6OC5fI09968
	for <britdisc-real@pansy.csv.warwick.ac.uk>; Tue, 24 Jul 2001 13:05:42 +0100 (BST)
Received: from mee06.mee.com ([194.130.244.68])
	by snowdrop.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f6OC5eQ02526
	for <britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk>; Tue, 24 Jul 2001 13:05:41 +0100 (BST)
Received: from mee01.mee.com (mee01.mee.com [194.130.245.17])
	by mee06.mee.com (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f6OC9BM16435
	for <britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk>; Tue, 24 Jul 2001 13:09:13 +0100 (BST)
Received: from mukmsg02.meuk.mee.com ([10.226.79.201] (may be forged))
	by mee01.mee.com (8.8.6 (PHNE_14041)/3.7W-mee01) with ESMTP id MAA14330
	for <britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk>; Tue, 24 Jul 2001 12:52:47 +0100 (BST)
From: Guy.Kennett@meuk.mee.com
Received: by mukmsg02.meuk.mee.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
	id <PHAJVLKS>; Tue, 24 Jul 2001 12:58:01 +0100
Message-ID: <900A7E55AE20F441AF80FBE427FE1A9A57FF69@mukmsg02.meuk.mee.com>
To: britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk
Subject: T4 Seedings
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2001 12:58:01 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-2022-jp"
Sender: owner-britdisc@warwick.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk


Did anyone else have a problem with Leeds re-seeding themselves from 9th to
4th after Clapham pulled out of T4 at such short notice?

Is there an "official" BUF rule for re-seeding after teams pull out between
tours?  

Guy
BAF OPEN