From britdisc-owner@csv.warwick.ac.uk  Mon Apr  7 14:37:37 1997
Received: by pansy.csv.warwick.ac.uk
	id OAA04106; Mon, 7 Apr 1997 14:16:15 +0100 (BST)
Received: from amsta.leeds.ac.uk by pansy.csv.warwick.ac.uk with ESMTP
	id OAA04094; Mon, 7 Apr 1997 14:16:05 +0100 (BST)
Received: from newton.leeds.amsta (newton.leeds.ac.uk [129.11.36.64])
	by amsta.leeds.ac.uk (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id OAA08740
	for <britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk>; Mon, 7 Apr 1997 14:16:09 +0100 (BST)
Received: by newton.leeds.amsta (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4)
	id OAA08090; Mon, 7 Apr 1997 14:16:35 +0100
Date: Mon, 7 Apr 1997 14:16:35 +0100
From: amtsjh@amsta.leeds.ac.uk (S J Hill)
Message-Id: <199704071316.OAA08090@newton.leeds.amsta>
To: britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk
Subject: Hitchin.  The Tour is underway....
X-Sun-Charset: US-ASCII
Sender: owner-britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk

Hello

This isn't a regular tourney report, but I thought (and I could be
wrong) that people might like to know how things went from the
tour perspective.

But first the results - then you don't have to look at the rest of it
if you can't be arsed.  I have included the no. of ranking points that
each team scores from the tourney.

(NB - with places 13-23 being taken from results from pools that finished
in such a way as to need points diff. to be used, etc - and then Chris
counting wrong! - the positions initially given out yesterday were not
right.)


BUF Ultim-8 Tour I - Hitchin
----------------------------

Pos. 	Team			Points
1. 	Shotgun			160
2. 	Catch 22		140
3. 	Druids			120
4. 	Stan			105  Spirit Winners
--------------------------------------
5.	Oxford Ultimate I	90
6. 	Chevron Action Flash	75
7. 	Violently Happy		60
8. 	First Touch		50
9. 	Strange Blue		40
10. 	Headrush		30
11. 	Red Jesters		25
12. 	Squawks			20
--------------------------------------
13. 	Village People		18
14. 	Floating Bloke		16
15. 	Sneeeky's		14
16. 	Playthings		12
17.	Jedi Children		10
18. 	SLUT			8
19. 	Oxford Ultimate II	6
20. 	Blue Arse Flies		5
21. 	Bliss			4
22. 	Hurricane		3
23. 	Superfly		2

(Only 23 teams entered.)

The tourney itself:

Saturday - VERY windy.
Sunday - no wind (and some SUN!) 

Shotgun beaten in domestic tournament for the first time since June 95 (?)
- but then go on to win comfortably on Sunday brushing aside Druids and
then Catch who capitalised on the change in weather conditions to make their
first Open final.

The old Sharks and Monks merge to form the Oxford Super-Club (yet to be named) -
and then get it together remarkably quickly to beat the strong-looking Chevron
in the game for 5th.

First Touch win their cross-over in to the top 8 but will unfortunately lose out
in Leicester because of the appearance of Shotgun II for the rest of the tour!

Village People (without their inspirational leader Guru Stu!) won the Sunday
competition for 13th place.

A few other points...

I think the new format was met with approval on the whole - of course having
23 teams makes things more complicated - congrats to Chris Hughes for coming
up with a very workable and sensible solution - even if it did make his "brain"
hurt.

All the teams at this tournament played as ROSTERED teams - which is good to see.
And there weren't many problems.  Teams seem be taking the idea on board and
sorting themselves out.  The only problems really only relate to World Club teams
and players - and these would happen anyway because of the WFDF rules about
WUCC.

There were 9 full size, marked pitches.  On Sunday we had scoreboards (the wind
on Saturday would have destroyed them!)  Expect pitch-side water and sports
massage(!) to appear in Leicester.  I think there was some confusion over the
fact that people had different game lengths in different sections of the tournament,
but that will improve.

On the down-side - especially after the fuss made of spirit at Nationals...
Teams were given score-sheets this w/e to fill in.  This worked on the whole.
The sheet for Sunday included a space for team's spirit votes.
Not all of these were given in.  Whilst the TDs tried to find people to collect spirit
votes from each team individually they could not find everyone. 
I don't know of many players that don't attach great prestige to winning spirit at
a tourney - esp. a big tourney - and yet so many of us are too lazy to fill in a sheet
of paper and leave it with the TD.  WHY?  I should say that MOST teams voted - but 
a handful didn't - which is a shame.

I'm sure other people will have things to say from their perspective so I'll leave it
there... see you in Leicester for round 2.

Just for interest teams that have so far entered Leicester (which can take 24 teams)
are (in the order they paid):
Catch 22, Stange Blue, Jedi Children, Druids, Village People, Shotgun I and II, Bliss,
Stan, First Touch, Floating Bloke, Sneeeky's, Chevron AF, Uriel, Oxford Ultimate I,
Squawks, Twin Peaks.
>From what I am told by other teams - there will not be any space by the end of the
week - at which point we will be able to tell everyone who gets in on the basis of
ranking, paying in time etc etc.

Cheers

Si Hill