From britdisc-owner@csv.warwick.ac.uk  Mon Dec 31 01:26:33 2001
Received: (from daemon@localhost)
	by pansy.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.11.6/8.11.6) id fBV1MM624316
	for britdisc-outgoing; Mon, 31 Dec 2001 01:22:22 GMT
Received: from snowdrop.csv.warwick.ac.uk (root@snowdrop [137.205.192.31])
	by pansy.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id fBV1MLu24311
	for <britdisc-real@pansy.csv.warwick.ac.uk>; Mon, 31 Dec 2001 01:22:21 GMT
Received: from cmailg4.svr.pol.co.uk (cmailg4.svr.pol.co.uk [195.92.195.174])
	by snowdrop.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id fBV1MKF09119
	for <britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk>; Mon, 31 Dec 2001 01:22:20 GMT
Received: from modem-699.buffalo.dialup.pol.co.uk ([217.134.66.187] helo=v2n6k5)
	by cmailg4.svr.pol.co.uk with smtp (Exim 3.13 #0)
	id 16Kr9f-0003Qk-00
	for britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk; Mon, 31 Dec 2001 01:22:19 +0000
Message-ID: <000f01c1919b$172bf640$bb4286d9@v2n6k5>
From: "Chris White" <penguins@hove42.freeserve.co.uk>
To: <britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk>
References: <F26ci3QIwemiG9zoate0000c4a8@hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: VIRUS ALERT - READ AND TAKE ACTION
Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2001 01:33:01 -0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200
Sender: owner-britdisc@warwick.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk

Also found at the Sophos site

20 December 2001

SULFNBK: Virus or hoax... or both?
Sophos has received a large number of calls from users concerned about a
virus known as SULFNBK or SULFNBK.EXE.

There is a warning message being distributed around the net (in various
languages) telling users to search their hard drives for a file called
SULFNBK.EXE. If they find it - the warning tells them - delete it because it
is infected by a virus which may trigger on 1 June (other versions say 25
May).

Sophos advises users to treat the warning with scepticism.

Many computers do have a legitimate uninfected version of SULFNBK.EXE on
them because it is a program which comes with Windows 95/98 to backup and
restore long filenames. Deleting the file may in fact cause your computer
system serious problems.

The confusion is compounded, however, by the W32/Magistr-A virus which is
capable of emailing infected copies of SULFNBK.EXE to innocent users. This
is probably how the scare started.

Sophos offers users confused by the hoax warning and the virus, the
following advice:

If you receive an unsolicited executable file in your email (such as
SULFNBK.EXE), simply delete the email. You should never launch or open
unsolicited executable code on your computer.
Existence of a file called SULFNBK.EXE on your hard drive is not evidence in
itself of a virus infection. The best way to check for a virus infection is
with anti-virus software.
Run a quality anti-virus product and keep it updated to protect against the
latest threats.
Do not pass on virus warnings to all of your friends. Instead, check the
facts at an anti-virus website, or forward the warning to the person in your
company who is responsible for virus protection so they can decide if it is
valid.

More info can be found at

http://www.sophos.com/virusinfo/articles/sulfnbk.html

Chris W