From britdisc-owner@csv.warwick.ac.uk  Tue Mar 19 14:02:28 2002
Received: from snowdrop.csv.warwick.ac.uk (root@snowdrop [137.205.192.31])
	by pansy.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g2JE2RR29810
	for <suaaz@mail.csv.warwick.ac.uk>; Tue, 19 Mar 2002 14:02:27 GMT
Received: from agave.csv.warwick.ac.uk (root@agave [137.205.192.52])
	by snowdrop.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g2JDq2v18449;
	Tue, 19 Mar 2002 13:52:02 GMT
Received: from agave.csv.warwick.ac.uk (daemon@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by agave.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.12.0/8.12.0) with ESMTP id g2JDlR0K009462
	for <britdisc-outgoing@agave.csv.warwick.ac.uk>; Tue, 19 Mar 2002 13:47:27 GMT
Received: (from daemon@localhost)
	by agave.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.12.0/8.12.0/Submit) id g2JDlRo9009461
	for britdisc-outgoing; Tue, 19 Mar 2002 13:47:27 GMT
Received: from daffodil.csv.warwick.ac.uk (root@daffodil [137.205.192.30])
	by agave.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.12.0/8.12.0) with ESMTP id g2JDlQ0K009456
	for <britdisc-real@majordomo.csv.warwick.ac.uk>; Tue, 19 Mar 2002 13:47:26 GMT
Received: from hotmail.com (f13.law8.hotmail.com [216.33.241.13])
	by daffodil.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g2JDlQn15912
	for <britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk>; Tue, 19 Mar 2002 13:47:26 GMT
Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC;
	 Tue, 19 Mar 2002 05:47:20 -0800
Received: from 217.163.5.253 by lw8fd.law8.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP;
	Tue, 19 Mar 2002 13:47:19 GMT
X-Originating-IP: [217.163.5.253]
From: "David Eastman" <david_eastman@hotmail.com>
To: cormaccosgrove@yahoo.co.uk, britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk
Subject: Re: Shafted
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2002 13:47:19 +0000
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
Message-ID: <F13o0cfshO2NSEwiGvT00012d78@hotmail.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 19 Mar 2002 13:47:20.0306 (UTC) FILETIME=[9720D520:01C1CF4C]
Sender: owner-britdisc@warwick.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk

Just to add to the confusion, teams are not, to my knowledge, restricted to 
qualifying in the region they 'belong' to. While I doubt many English teams 
will try their luck in Scotland next year, region cherry picking is still an 
issue. So fiddling about with qualification spots isn't a great idea at the 
moment.

David Eastman, Hammerage


PS. Well done to Lewis and co. on their storming performance.


>From: cormac cosgrove <cormaccosgrove@yahoo.co.uk>
>To: britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk
>Subject: Re: Shafted
>Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2002 11:56:06 +0000 (GMT)
>
>>in addition, if a particular region had two or three
>barren years then where would you draw the line in
>terms of reducing their qualification spots? it seems
>a little unfair if a region ended up with 1
>qualification spot, or even 2. it also seems pretty
>much against the spirit of the game.
>
>so basically, i think that it is quite a good set up
>at the moment, and that the reduction of qualification
>spots for the so called ' weaker' regions is not the
>way forward as things tend to change from year to
>year, and the method at the minute seems quite
>flexible wnough to deal with the changes.
>
>cormac
>STD Ultimate
>
>
>
>

_________________________________________________________________
Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com