From britdisc-owner@csv.warwick.ac.uk  Wed Apr 10 09:45:45 2002
Received: from daffodil.csv.warwick.ac.uk (root@daffodil [137.205.192.30])
	by pansy.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g3A8jhd15823
	for <suaaz@mail.csv.warwick.ac.uk>; Wed, 10 Apr 2002 09:45:43 +0100 (BST)
Received: from agave.csv.warwick.ac.uk (root@agave [137.205.192.52])
	by daffodil.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g3A8au718022;
	Wed, 10 Apr 2002 09:36:56 +0100 (BST)
Received: from agave.csv.warwick.ac.uk (daemon@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by agave.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.12.0/8.12.0) with ESMTP id g3A8TnQR018304
	for <britdisc-outgoing@agave.csv.warwick.ac.uk>; Wed, 10 Apr 2002 09:29:50 +0100 (BST)
Received: (from daemon@localhost)
	by agave.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.12.0/8.12.0/Submit) id g3A8Tnj3018303
	for britdisc-outgoing; Wed, 10 Apr 2002 09:29:49 +0100 (BST)
Received: from daffodil.csv.warwick.ac.uk (root@daffodil [137.205.192.30])
	by agave.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.12.0/8.12.0) with ESMTP id g3A8TmQR018298
	for <britdisc-real@majordomo.csv.warwick.ac.uk>; Wed, 10 Apr 2002 09:29:48 +0100 (BST)
Received: from hotmail.com (f121.law12.hotmail.com [64.4.19.121])
	by daffodil.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g3A8Tl716264
	for <britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk>; Wed, 10 Apr 2002 09:29:47 +0100 (BST)
Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC;
	 Wed, 10 Apr 2002 01:29:41 -0700
Received: from 194.200.241.6 by lw12fd.law12.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP;
	Wed, 10 Apr 2002 08:29:38 GMT
X-Originating-IP: [194.200.241.6]
From: "Adam Milner" <pingoneup@hotmail.com>
To: avondale.action@ntlworld.com
Cc: britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk
Subject: Re: TOUR & Relegation
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2002 08:29:38 +0000
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
Message-ID: <F121v9cMiLCeirN8pMU00007e7f@hotmail.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 10 Apr 2002 08:29:41.0436 (UTC) FILETIME=[DC3E8FC0:01C1E069]
Sender: owner-britdisc@warwick.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk

Hussey,

>More importantly, by having a women's tour alongside tour 1, it >encourages 
>seperation of the sport into men's and women's.

There are only 4 womens teams in the womens tour, I can't believe thats all 
the women we have. Women will still play for open teams this weekend. In 
fact some might play in the open and the womens events if they can, its been 
done in the past.

>Isn't one of the BEST things about ultimate the fact that men and >women 
>are EQUAL? I think so. It's one of the few sports where gender >is 
>irrelevant.

Don't even get me started. Just read that again and take a deep breath. Now 
tell me why Open champions don't have women on the team? I'm not saying our 
women are bad, we've got some of the best women in the world but 'gender is 
irrelevant'....

>There are plenty of other weekends where an Open Women's Tour could be 
> >arranged surely?

Isn't that what happens with womens indoors and outdoors? Ok you could have 
more events instead of going straight to Nationals but at the moment having 
a womens tour held alongside the open tour is a good compromise until there 
is a demand for more women's events.

>I fully support the mixed events as well, and these should definately >be 
>kept seperate too.

Can't argue with that.

Adam
Chevron



_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp.