From britdisc-owner@csv.warwick.ac.uk Thu Apr 11 13:14:40 2002 Received: from daffodil.csv.warwick.ac.uk (root@daffodil [137.205.192.30]) by pansy.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g3BCEdd27189 for <suaaz@mail.csv.warwick.ac.uk>; Thu, 11 Apr 2002 13:14:39 +0100 (BST) Received: from agave.csv.warwick.ac.uk (root@agave [137.205.192.52]) by daffodil.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g3BC62720483; Thu, 11 Apr 2002 13:06:02 +0100 (BST) Received: from agave.csv.warwick.ac.uk (daemon@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by agave.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.12.0/8.12.0) with ESMTP id g3BBx4QR000421 for <britdisc-outgoing@agave.csv.warwick.ac.uk>; Thu, 11 Apr 2002 12:59:06 +0100 (BST) Received: (from daemon@localhost) by agave.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.12.0/8.12.0/Submit) id g3BBx4Fc000420 for britdisc-outgoing; Thu, 11 Apr 2002 12:59:04 +0100 (BST) Received: from snowdrop.csv.warwick.ac.uk (root@snowdrop [137.205.192.31]) by agave.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.12.0/8.12.0) with ESMTP id g3BBx2QR000413 for <britdisc-real@majordomo.csv.warwick.ac.uk>; Thu, 11 Apr 2002 12:59:02 +0100 (BST) Received: from mail1.messagelabs.com (mail1.messagelabs.com [212.125.75.4]) by snowdrop.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id g3BBx2t10006 for <britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk>; Thu, 11 Apr 2002 12:59:02 +0100 (BST) X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 2293 invoked from network); 11 Apr 2002 11:58:56 -0000 Received: from mail.oyster.co.uk (HELO aurora.oyster.co.uk) (193.132.201.148) by server-7.tower-1.messagelabs.com with SMTP; 11 Apr 2002 11:58:56 -0000 Received: by AURORA with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id <GZQT9SVQ>; Thu, 11 Apr 2002 12:58:56 +0100 Message-ID: <7165D5A55FC4D41184DB00D0B7B9E62D0480D3D0@AURORA> From: Roger Thomson <Roger.Thomson@oyster.com> To: "'roof11uk'" <kduk5@sussex.ac.uk>, britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk Subject: RE: Disqualifications Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 12:58:51 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: owner-britdisc@warwick.ac.uk Precedence: bulk We were blacklisted from Tour 1, which means that *if* the tournament was oversubscribed Clapham 2 would have fallen off the bottom. Thanks to Adam's large capacity that won't be necessary. It's nice to know someone out there cares and is watching out for us ;-) rt cu#1 -----Original Message----- From: roof11uk [mailto:kduk5@sussex.ac.uk] Sent: 11 April 2002 12:35 To: britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk Subject: Disqualifications I was under the impression that Clapham 2 were Disqualified freom tour 1 this year as they pulled out of last years final tour at very late notice. It would probably be good if this issue was resolved before saturday. Cheers, Roof ----------------------------------------------------------- Internet communications are not secure and therefore Oyster Partners Ltd does not accept legal responsibility for the contents of this message. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Oyster Partners Ltd.