From britdisc-owner@csv.warwick.ac.uk Fri Apr 12 14:07:42 2002 Received: from daffodil.csv.warwick.ac.uk (root@daffodil [137.205.192.30]) by pansy.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g3CD7fd22819 for <suaaz@mail.csv.warwick.ac.uk>; Fri, 12 Apr 2002 14:07:41 +0100 (BST) Received: from agave.csv.warwick.ac.uk (root@agave [137.205.192.52]) by daffodil.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g3CD1d708603; Fri, 12 Apr 2002 14:01:39 +0100 (BST) Received: from agave.csv.warwick.ac.uk (daemon@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by agave.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.12.0/8.12.0) with ESMTP id g3CCpVQR011603 for <britdisc-outgoing@agave.csv.warwick.ac.uk>; Fri, 12 Apr 2002 13:51:32 +0100 (BST) Received: (from daemon@localhost) by agave.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.12.0/8.12.0/Submit) id g3CCpVQs011602 for britdisc-outgoing; Fri, 12 Apr 2002 13:51:31 +0100 (BST) Received: from daffodil.csv.warwick.ac.uk (root@daffodil [137.205.192.30]) by agave.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.12.0/8.12.0) with ESMTP id g3CCpTQR011597 for <britdisc-real@majordomo.csv.warwick.ac.uk>; Fri, 12 Apr 2002 13:51:30 +0100 (BST) Received: from mail1.messagelabs.com (mail1.messagelabs.com [212.125.75.4]) by daffodil.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id g3CCpT706810 for <britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk>; Fri, 12 Apr 2002 13:51:29 +0100 (BST) X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 20109 invoked from network); 12 Apr 2002 12:51:22 -0000 Received: from mail.oyster.co.uk (HELO aurora.oyster.co.uk) (193.132.201.148) by server-8.tower-1.messagelabs.com with SMTP; 12 Apr 2002 12:51:22 -0000 Received: by AURORA with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id <GZQT9XDJ>; Fri, 12 Apr 2002 13:51:22 +0100 Message-ID: <7165D5A55FC4D41184DB00D0B7B9E62D0480D40A@AURORA> From: Roger Thomson <Roger.Thomson@oyster.com> To: britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk Subject: RE: Disqualifications Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 13:51:11 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: owner-britdisc@warwick.ac.uk Precedence: bulk >So we don't know whether Clapham 2 might be prevented from participating >at a 'smaller' Tour event. Chris Hughes (then DoC) and the u8c stated at the time: >This is the agreed punishment from u8c: >Blacklist Clapham 2 for the next tour event (Tour 1 2002) as per the rules. So it has no consquences for future Tour events, and therefore shouldn't impact our preparations for Hawaii. Thankfully. c u all in Bristol, in the bar if not on the field, rt cu#1 -----Original Message----- From: Wayne Retter [mailto:druid#6@phidelta.demon.co.uk] Sent: 12 April 2002 00:47 To: britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk Subject: Re: Disqualifications "blacklisting" is covered in the Tour Rules, to be found at http://www.ukultimate.com/docs/tour2002rules.htm Clapham 2 are allowed to play at T1 I just realised, however, that the Rules don't specify how long the Blacklist entry stands for - one event? one year? for ever?. So we don't know whether Clapham 2 might be prevented from participating at a 'smaller' Tour event. Can of worms !? Wayne Thu, 11 Apr 2002, by Christian Nistri <mailto:wigsy22@hotmail.com>; Subject: Disqualifications >below is what was written last year after Tour $ re: clapham 2 - what does >blacklisted mean? >wigsy ---------------------------------------------------------------- Wayne Retter mobile: 07970-903420 w.retter@bigfoot.com office: 01737-273655 ----------------------------------------------------------- Internet communications are not secure and therefore Oyster Partners Ltd does not accept legal responsibility for the contents of this message. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Oyster Partners Ltd.