From britdisc-owner@csv.warwick.ac.uk Thu Jun 6 14:11:50 2002 Received: from sorrel.csv.warwick.ac.uk (root@sorrel [137.205.192.54]) by pansy.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g56DBmI03097 for <suaaz@mail.csv.warwick.ac.uk>; Thu, 6 Jun 2002 14:11:49 +0100 (BST) Received: from agave.csv.warwick.ac.uk (root@agave [137.205.192.52]) by sorrel.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.12.0/8.12.0) with ESMTP id g56D7TqL017430; Thu, 6 Jun 2002 14:07:29 +0100 (BST) Received: from agave.csv.warwick.ac.uk (daemon@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by agave.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.12.0/8.12.0) with ESMTP id g56D49QR026241 for <britdisc-outgoing@agave.csv.warwick.ac.uk>; Thu, 6 Jun 2002 14:04:09 +0100 (BST) Received: (from daemon@localhost) by agave.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.12.0/8.12.0/Submit) id g56D49AE026240 for britdisc-outgoing; Thu, 6 Jun 2002 14:04:09 +0100 (BST) Received: from sorrel.csv.warwick.ac.uk (root@sorrel [137.205.192.54]) by agave.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.12.0/8.12.0) with ESMTP id g56D48QR026235 for <britdisc-real@majordomo.csv.warwick.ac.uk>; Thu, 6 Jun 2002 14:04:08 +0100 (BST) Received: from thorium.btinternet.com (thorium.btinternet.com [194.73.73.67]) by sorrel.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.12.0/8.12.0) with ESMTP id g56D48qL016878 for <britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk>; Thu, 6 Jun 2002 14:04:08 +0100 (BST) Received: from mendelevium ([194.75.226.23]) by thorium.btinternet.com with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #8) id 17Fwvv-0002ld-00; Thu, 06 Jun 2002 14:04:07 +0100 Received: from 212.20.245.6 by mendelevium ([194.75.226.23]); Thu, 06 Jun 02 14:04:07 BST Message-ID: <1977976.1023368647940.JavaMail.root@127.0.0.1> Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2002 14:04:07 +0100 (BST) From: laurapearce@btinternet.com To: leeds-ultimate@talk21.com, britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk Subject: Re: COED TII SCHEDULE Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-MAILER: talk21.com WAS v2 Sender: owner-britdisc@warwick.ac.uk Precedence: bulk I'm sure you've already noticed, or someone else has already pointed out, that as the Saturday schedule stands, the top teams in each pool play the second teams twice and don't play the fourth teams at all. Also, and while I acknowledge that I am not a TD, is it really sensible to have the 'crunch' game in each pool first thing on Saturday - doesn't it make more sense to have it later in the day/last game of the pool? Or is this where the error is (ie it should be 1v4 first game). Clarification would be appreciated. Laura > from: leeds-ultimate@talk21.com > date: Thu, 06 Jun 2002 13:22:52 > to: britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk > subject: Re: COED TII SCHEDULE > > > Mixed Tour 2 > > Team Pool A Pool B Pool C Pool D > 1 Grazed'n'confused Easy Tiger Cyrille Excess Bee > 2 Hull Inbreds Maiden Bungle Chevron BAF > 3 YBK Superfly Salt'n'sauce We've got guns > 4 Aurora YPMU Venom Red > > Games 50mins long. When hooter sounds finish the point. If the scores are with in two points When hooter sounds finish the point. If the scores are within 2 points play > play a two point cap. If one team is 3 or more points up the game is over. > No half time or Time outs. > > Saturday > > Time Pitch 1 Pitch 2 Pitch 3 Pitch 4 > > 9.30 A1 v A2 B1 v B2 C1 v C2 D1 v D2 > > 10.30 A2 v A3 B2 v B3 C2 v C3 D2 v D3 > > 11.30 A1 v A3 B1 v B3 C1 v C3 D1 v D3 > > 12.30 A2 v A4 B2 v B4 C2 v C4 D2 v D4 > > 13.30 A1 v A2 B1 v B2 C1 v C2 D1 v D2 > > 14.30 A3 v A4 B3 v B4 C3 v C4 D3 v D4 > > 15.30 5 v 10 6 v 9 7 v 12 8 v 11 > > > > Sunday > > Time Pitch 1 Pitch 2 Pitch 3 Pitch 4 > > 10.00 9 v 15 10 v 16 11 v 13 12 v 14 > > 11.00 1 v 7 2 v 8 3 v 5 4 v 6 > > 12.00 9 v 12 10 v 11 12 v 16 13 v 15 > > 13.00 1 v 4 2 v 3 5 v 8 6 v 7 > > 14.00 9 v 10 11 v 12 13 v 14 15 v 16 > > 15.00 3 v 4 5 v 6 7 v 8 > > 15.30 1 v 2 Final - 1 Hour Long with 2pt cap > > > > > -------------------- > talk21 your FREE portable and private address on the net at http://www.talk21.com > >