From britdisc-owner@csv.warwick.ac.uk Tue Jul 14 08:42:14 1998
Received: (from daemon@localhost)
by pansy.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.8.7/8.8.8) id IAA12055
for britdisc-outgoing; Tue, 14 Jul 1998 08:29:00 +0100 (BST)
Received: from gatekeeper.sands.com (gatekeeper.sands.com [193.133.75.180])
by pansy.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.8.7/8.8.8) with SMTP id IAA12049
for <britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk>; Tue, 14 Jul 1998 08:28:56 +0100 (BST)
Received: by gatekeeper.sands.com id AA13508
(InterLock SMTP Gateway 3.0 for britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk);
Tue, 14 Jul 1998 08:28:53 +0100
Received: by gatekeeper.sands.com (Internal Mail Agent-2);
Tue, 14 Jul 1998 08:28:53 +0100
Received: by gatekeeper.sands.com (Internal Mail Agent-1);
Tue, 14 Jul 1998 08:28:53 +0100
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 98 08:18:36 GMT
From: "Caedman Oakley" <Caedman.Oakley@uk.drsolomon.com>
Message-Id: <9806149004.AA900430117@mailgate.sands.com>
To: britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk
Subject: Co-ed
Sender: owner-britdisc@warwick.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk
This has probably been done to death, but anyways....
Seeing that there were 5(?) women's teams at Exeter, and some women
playing on their regular teams only, ->
How about more stictly co-ed tournaments?
I would welcome the introduction of more co-ed tournaments. 3/4
splits are great, and would prevent the sport going into a Mens/Womens
split. Ultimate is a mixed team sport as well as single sex, and it
would be really good to see this happening. If I had a place that I
could put on a tournament, it would be co-ed... That way people like
Gun, UTI, etc would have to find 4/5 women to play.
I know that this might seem to some out there that this is because I
can't meet women through normal channels (you may be right), but I
came into the sport with the co-ed ideal, and am a little sorry to see
that it is being forgotten. (except by Red as far as I can see).
Thanks for reading,
Cads (Whiny Sappy Person)