From britdisc-owner@csv.warwick.ac.uk  Tue Jul 14 09:15:33 1998
Received: (from daemon@localhost)
	by pansy.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.8.7/8.8.8) id JAA15126
	for britdisc-outgoing; Tue, 14 Jul 1998 09:04:06 +0100 (BST)
Received: from gatekeeper.sands.com (gatekeeper.sands.com [193.133.75.180])
	by pansy.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.8.7/8.8.8) with SMTP id JAA15109
	for <britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk>; Tue, 14 Jul 1998 09:04:01 +0100 (BST)
Received: by gatekeeper.sands.com id AA14197
  (InterLock SMTP Gateway 3.0 for britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk);
  Tue, 14 Jul 1998 09:03:55 +0100
Received: by gatekeeper.sands.com (Internal Mail Agent-2);
  Tue, 14 Jul 1998 09:03:55 +0100
Received: by gatekeeper.sands.com (Internal Mail Agent-1);
  Tue, 14 Jul 1998 09:03:55 +0100
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 98 08:51:08 GMT
From: "Caedman Oakley" <Caedman.Oakley@uk.drsolomon.com>
Message-Id: <9806149004.AA900432214@mailgate.sands.com>
To: britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk
Sender: owner-britdisc@warwick.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk

     Seems I have caused confusion.  
     
     What I was trying to point out was the fact that there are very few 
     co-ed *tournaments*, not that there were no co-ed teams (every team I 
     have played on has had at least one woman playing for it).
     
     I really was trying to get the point across that as far as I can 
     remember there is only one truly co-ed tournament (Red Co-ed).
     
     Sorry for any ambiguity in my statements, I did not mean to cause any 
     offence.
     
     Cads.
     
     _________________________________
     These are my personal views only.
     _________________________________