From britdisc-owner@csv.warwick.ac.uk  Wed Oct  7 11:16:23 1998
Received: (from daemon@localhost)
	by pansy.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.8.7/8.8.8) id KAA00783
	for britdisc-outgoing; Wed, 7 Oct 1998 10:59:09 +0100 (BST)
Received: from curlew.cs.man.ac.uk (curlew.cs.man.ac.uk [130.88.13.7])
	by pansy.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.8.7/8.8.8) with ESMTP id KAA00760
	for <britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk>; Wed, 7 Oct 1998 10:59:05 +0100 (BST)
Received: from fs1.art.man.ac.uk ([130.88.57.1])
	by curlew.cs.man.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 1.92 #2)
	for britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk
	id 0zQqMr-0001NP-02; Wed, 7 Oct 1998 10:58:50 +0100
Received: from UK-AC-MAN-ART-FS1/SpoolDir by fs1.art.man.ac.uk (Mercury 1.44);
    7 Oct 98 10:58:49 GMT0BST
Received: from SpoolDir by UK-AC-MAN-ART-FS1 (Mercury 1.43); 7 Oct 98 10:58:24 GMT0BST
From: "Wigsy" <mfix6can@fs1.art.man.ac.uk>
Organization: University of Manchester
To: britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 1998 10:58:23 GMT0BST
Subject: Tour 99
Reply-to: mfix6can@stud.man.ac.uk
X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (v2.42a)
Message-ID: <B8EDF9687D@fs1.art.man.ac.uk>
Sender: owner-britdisc@warwick.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk

Not really with reference to anything else I think the important 
thing for the tour is that teams play teams of similar quality. If a 
team gets to good for a division then it could move up right? So I 
think from what I have heard people are in favour of some 
sort of division system. Along the lines of having 12 teams in the 
top division I think this would be almost going back to the old 
traditional format of tournies, as for example Catch, UTI, Chevvy and 
whatever Gun become would easily beat the teams who came 
10th-11th-12th. So we would be back to the bagel's on the Saturday 
and everything to play for on the Sunday. I am simply saying that the 
top division cannot be more than a certain size because otherwise the 
games become ludicrous. By all means make the lower divisions bigger 
and so more competitive. Gotta go lectures
Wigsy