From britdisc-owner@csv.warwick.ac.uk Tue Sep 7 19:41:02 1999
Received: by pansy.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) id TAA12229
for britdisc-outgoing; Tue, 7 Sep 1999 19:39:52 +0100 (BST)
Received: from snowdrop.csv.warwick.ac.uk (snowdrop [137.205.192.31])
by pansy.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA12221
for <britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk>; Tue, 7 Sep 1999 19:39:50 +0100 (BST)
Received: from mail-gw1.webleicester.net (mailgate.webleicester.co.uk [195.146.160.12])
by snowdrop.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA18342
for <britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk>; Tue, 7 Sep 1999 19:39:49 +0100 (BST)
Received: from pii266 (pool-pri1-002.webleicester.co.uk [195.146.164.2])
by mail-gw1.webleicester.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id TAA03051
for <britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk>; Tue, 7 Sep 1999 19:42:37 +0100 (BST)
Message-ID: <004f01bef960$fc310440$02a492c3@pii266>
From: "Ben Ravilious" <bravil@webleicester.co.uk>
To: "BRITDISC" <britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: nationals
Date: Tue, 7 Sep 1999 19:41:27 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0038_01BEF968.F99EC700"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.1
X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3
Sender: owner-britdisc@warwick.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_0038_01BEF968.F99EC700
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Simon
That is 99% utter crap but seeing as your email is 'tongue in cheek' I =
shall ignore it. FYI Simon Church is a 'Home Energy Officer' (thats the =
1% truth) so he is obviously able to knock up a few pitches on the sly =
!?!=20
At least it was mildy amusing...
:-p
Ben
(Just ordered the Red minibus from the Nationals profits - its made by =
Matchbox)
-----Original Message-----
From: Simon P Barlow <dgcltd@dgcltd.screaming.net>
To: britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk <britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk>
Cc: Leicester Ultimate Club <red@ultimateweb.co.uk>; HUGHES, Chris =
<CHughes@chelt.ac.uk>
Date: 07 September 1999 18:43
Subject: nationals
=20
=20
Ben & Chris
=20
My comments were meant slightly tongue in cheek to put forward the =
point that tournament directors/clubs make far too much profit out of a =
tourney .And how the price of entry to tournaments has increased =
considerably over the past couple of years since the introduction of the =
"compulsory tournaments".
I feel personally that if / when the UK Ultimate community decide to =
form the BUA to take over from the BUF, then when these compulsory =
tournaments in the future are put on then all the profits/less =
reasonable expenses, should go back to the BUA instead of the present =
situation that we have found ourselves in where certain individuals =
profit. Before you say BUF TAX let me point out that I feel this rate =
needs to be increased.
And as to your comment Ben about Victoria park being free!! You told =
me that you didn't have to pay for tour 1 as Leicester council =
decided/never asked for the money after the event. And Red never gave =
anyone any money back!!! (so did you make =A350 for every pitch you =
didn't pay for last time).
I'm not bothered as these days you don't get anything for free and =
if they do it again this time then you can consider yourselves luckier/ =
(Richer) !!!
Also doesn't one of the Red players work for Leicester council??? =
Red tape , Lost invoices and all that !!!!
And by the way how many teams did bid for this years nationals!! =
apart from "Leicester city council"
=20
Si.b now nursing my hands after having my knuckles rapped
=20
P.S I know how difficult it is to run Tournaments as I have run many =
tennis (week long) tournaments that's why I don't want to run an =
ultimate one as I know how many moaning players there are in our =
wonderful sport.
=20
Ben I now expect pooper scoupers by every pitch !!=20
------=_NextPart_000_0038_01BEF968.F99EC700
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META content=3Dtext/html;charset=3Diso-8859-1 =
http-equiv=3DContent-Type><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 =
Transitional//EN">
<META content=3D'"MSHTML 4.72.3110.7"' name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV>Simon</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>That is 99% utter crap but seeing as your email is 'tongue in =
cheek' I=20
shall ignore it. FYI Simon Church is a 'Home Energy Officer' =
(thats the 1%=20
truth) so he is obviously able to knock up a few pitches on the sly !?! =
</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D3>At least it was mildy amusing...</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D3>:-p</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D3></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3D"" size=3D3>Ben</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=3D#000000 face=3D"" size=3D3>(Just ordered the Red =
minibus from the=20
Nationals profits - its made by Matchbox)</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE=20
style=3D"BORDER-LEFT: #000000 solid 2px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-LEFT: =
5px">
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2><B>-----Original =
Message-----</B><BR><B>From:=20
</B>Simon P Barlow <<A=20
=
href=3D"mailto:dgcltd@dgcltd.screaming.net">dgcltd@dgcltd.screaming.net</=
A>><BR><B>To:=20
</B><A=20
=
href=3D"mailto:britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk">britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk</A>=
=20
<<A=20
=
href=3D"mailto:britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk">britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk</A>=
><BR><B>Cc:=20
</B>Leicester Ultimate Club <<A=20
href=3D"mailto:red@ultimateweb.co.uk">red@ultimateweb.co.uk</A>>; =
HUGHES,=20
Chris <<A=20
=
href=3D"mailto:CHughes@chelt.ac.uk">CHughes@chelt.ac.uk</A>><BR><B>Dat=
e:=20
</B>07 September 1999 18:43<BR><B>Subject:=20
</B>nationals<BR><BR></DIV></FONT>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2>
<DIV>Ben & Chris</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>My comments were meant slightly tongue in cheek to put forward =
the=20
point that tournament directors/clubs make far too much profit =
out of a=20
tourney .And how the price of entry to tournaments has increased=20
considerably over the past couple of years since the introduction of =
the=20
"compulsory tournaments".</DIV>
<DIV>I feel personally that if / when the UK Ultimate=20
community decide to form the BUA to take over from =
the BUF,=20
then when these compulsory tournaments in the future are put on =
then=20
all the profits/less reasonable expenses, should go =
back to the=20
BUA instead of the present situation that we have found ourselves in =
where=20
certain individuals profit. Before you say BUF TAX let me point out =
that I=20
feel this rate needs to be increased.</DIV>
<DIV>And as to your comment Ben about Victoria park being free!! You =
told me=20
that you didn't have to pay for tour 1 as Leicester council =
decided/never=20
asked for the money after the event. And Red never gave anyone =
any=20
money back!!! (so did you make £50 for every pitch you didn't =
pay for=20
last time).</DIV>
<DIV>I'm not bothered as these days you don't get anything for free =
and if=20
they do it again this time then you can consider yourselves luckier/ =
(Richer) !!!</DIV>
<DIV>Also doesn't one of the Red players work for Leicester =
council??? Red=20
tape , Lost invoices and all that !!!!</DIV>
<DIV>And by the way how many teams did bid for this years =
nationals!! apart=20
from "Leicester city council"</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Si.b now nursing my hands after having =
my=20
knuckles rapped</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>P.S I know how difficult it is to run Tournaments as I have run =
many=20
tennis (week long) tournaments that's why I don't want to run an =
ultimate=20
one as I know how many moaning players there are in our wonderful=20
sport.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Ben I now expect pooper scoupers by every pitch !!=20
</DIV></FONT></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>
------=_NextPart_000_0038_01BEF968.F99EC700--