From britdisc-owner@csv.warwick.ac.uk  Tue Mar 25 15:40:00 1997
Received: by pansy.csv.warwick.ac.uk
	id PAA02753; Tue, 25 Mar 1997 15:16:32 GMT
From: amasson@derwent.co.uk
Received: from rh2.derwent.co.uk by pansy.csv.warwick.ac.uk with SMTP
	id PAA02727; Tue, 25 Mar 1997 15:16:21 GMT
Received: from iegate.derwent.co.uk by rh2.derwent.co.uk with smtp 
	(SMAIL3.1.28.1#5)
	id m0w9Xzl-0001DAC;Tue, 25 Mar 97 15:18  GMT
Received: from ccMail by iegate.derwent.co.uk
  (IMA Internet Exchange 2.1 Enterprise) id 00022DAA; Tue, 25 Mar 97 14:59:53 +0000
Mime-Version: 1.0
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 1997 15:01:18 +0000
Message-ID: <00022DAA.1271@derwent.co.uk>
Subject: Re:double team
To: britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Description: cc:Mail note part
Sender: owner-britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk

     Scott's right you can't call a double team when the supposedly 
     offending "D" player is marking an "O" player in the exclusion zone. 
     
     The only helpful thing I can add is that if you were confused by the 
     call you should have asked the caller to explain it, if not during the 
     game, then certainly straight after. 
     
     If you don't ask you'll never know.