From britdisc-owner@csv.warwick.ac.uk  Mon Mar 18 21:56:09 2002
Received: from snowdrop.csv.warwick.ac.uk (root@snowdrop [137.205.192.31])
	by pansy.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g2ILu8R06407
	for <suaaz@mail.csv.warwick.ac.uk>; Mon, 18 Mar 2002 21:56:08 GMT
Received: from agave.csv.warwick.ac.uk (root@agave [137.205.192.52])
	by snowdrop.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g2ILpMv14331;
	Mon, 18 Mar 2002 21:51:22 GMT
Received: from agave.csv.warwick.ac.uk (daemon@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by agave.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.12.0/8.12.0) with ESMTP id g2ILmD0K000641
	for <britdisc-outgoing@agave.csv.warwick.ac.uk>; Mon, 18 Mar 2002 21:48:13 GMT
Received: (from daemon@localhost)
	by agave.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.12.0/8.12.0/Submit) id g2ILmDil000640
	for britdisc-outgoing; Mon, 18 Mar 2002 21:48:13 GMT
Received: from daffodil.csv.warwick.ac.uk (root@daffodil [137.205.192.30])
	by agave.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.12.0/8.12.0) with ESMTP id g2ILmC0K000635
	for <britdisc-real@majordomo.csv.warwick.ac.uk>; Mon, 18 Mar 2002 21:48:12 GMT
Received: from hotmail.com (f277.law10.hotmail.com [64.4.14.152])
	by daffodil.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g2ILmBn02551
	for <britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk>; Mon, 18 Mar 2002 21:48:11 GMT
Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC;
	 Mon, 18 Mar 2002 13:48:03 -0800
Received: from 130.102.5.63 by lw10fd.law10.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP;
	Mon, 18 Mar 2002 21:48:03 GMT
X-Originating-IP: [130.102.5.63]
From: "Jon Good" <funky_like_a_train@hotmail.com>
To: A.S.W.Hall@exeter.ac.uk, britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk
Subject: Shafted 
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2002 21:48:03 +0000
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
Message-ID: <F277pWd7KKQpQq5pnee0000025f@hotmail.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 18 Mar 2002 21:48:03.0562 (UTC) FILETIME=[94A2ACA0:01C1CEC6]
Sender: owner-britdisc@warwick.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk

Andrew,
       it does seem as if you were robbed. To my knowledge in previous years 
the situation has always been that if a team pulled out of a finals event, 
the spot went to the next best qualifier from that region. This always 
seemed fair and I don't understand why this wasn't the case. Somebody 
somewhere f*@!$d up and you and the rest of your team has my sympathy (for 
what it's worth).

I reckon Nationals should be replayed, unless BAF won in which case better 
luck next time!

Jon 'Le Boeuf' Good - BAF & Flatball (when able to walk)

_________________________________________________________________
MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: 
http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx